Sad day

[StarTech]

It is quite easy to make up reports on the internet. Anyone with a computer and a n internet connection can do it.

Personally the three layer mask are not that restrictive. You ought try wearing an organic vapor mask. Now they are restrictive but are necessary when working toxic organic vapors such as automobile paints and drylock water proofers or you will probably end up in the horsepital.

From my point of view most people are just listening to people that just want you sick to make a profit off your ills. I have sit back and just laugh themselves silly when get some idiot to do what said to do. They simply don't care your health. That like telling someone it is perfectly safe to jump off a 10 story building without a parachute or safety net. They just stand and laugh at the poor fool that did it.

Even your own doctor will prescribe medicines that a can have serious side effects. Mine prescribe one med for my blood pressure that made me to see things like a rat building a nest on my chest and other non existent animals. Boy I quit that med and burned the left overs. The next set pills he prescribed would required me to take blood tests every two weeks as they were that dangerous to my kidneys. Needless to say I figured out what I needed and now have the pressure under control with the current med I am taking twice daily.

Anyway I have became anti social because of the ones that wish to risk their and my health.

 

[longhike]

Did any of you people hear jan the by done Whitehouse spokesperson. Say about covid as a (plandemic)

Well, it appears that you’ve determined that it does have to do with conspiracies because that’s where all of these conversations end. “They” are always doing “something” and the only ones that know about it live in the bowels of the internet. And the majority of the independent medical and scientific community must be wrong.

I think I got it now.

 

[bertsmobile1]

Nope nothing to do with freedoms. Has to do totally with the jab is not safe. As I was saying You jab people will start dropping like flies getting hit by fly spray. I seen a report today that more people that got the jab is filling hospital's over the 50% then not. If I do not wear a mask it has to do with My age I'm old. And having COPD & ASTHMA. Did any of you people hear jan the by done Whitehouse spokesperson. Say about covid as a (plandemic)
You people watch to much mainstream media. And not doing enough of your own research. I'm retired and all I have is time to research. To this day I still know no one personally that has died of covid. But lots of Family & Friends have died of cancer.

Not sure what you are trying to say or where you got those numbers from but they look rather like someone made them up then they have been cross posted 10,000 times because some people want them to be correct.
The vaccine is as safe as it can be made and most of the resistance is simply "Fear of the new" which is quite normal
At one time it was a well known undispituted fact that having electric lights in your home would drive you mad and give your children brain cancer .
Now the original vaccine formula was designed for Covid -19 Mk I
We are now being attacked by Covid-19 Mk V
And just like the flu vaccine that needs to be tweeked annually the Covid vaccines will need to be tweeked to make it more effective against the current variant.
This is one of the reasons why I am a firm believer in erradication because this will be never ending particularly if we allow it to run rampant in third world countries so provide a breeding platform for more nasty variants to thrive .
As for research, you need to understand that anything other than the actual source is hearsay & opinion so what you have to read is the actual clinical reports, not some ones interpretations of the clinical reports.
So the only thing opinions should be based on is what is found as first hand reporting in medical & scientific journals.
Give me any clinical data and I can extrapolate totally different conclusions depending upon my beliefs or who is paying me to alter your beliefs .
Even then you have to be critical
Any graph without error bars and not showing all the data ( including the points that don't fit ) is to be considered suspect .
reading the same misrepresentation repeated by 200,000 different people does not make it correct .

Information comes in many forms but it is only the PRIMARY information that can be trusted and even then you have to look carefully at it.
Most of what we get in the medial is tertiary at best and usually 4th generation and then 5th generation opinion on the 4th generation reporting.

 

[fixit1ddh]

Not sure what you are trying to say or where you got those numbers from but they look rather like someone made them up then they have been cross posted 10,000 times because some people want them to be correct.
The vaccine is as safe as it can be made and most of the resistance is simply "Fear of the new" which is quite normal
At one time it was a well known undispituted fact that having electric lights in your home would drive you mad and give your children brain cancer .
Now the original vaccine formula was designed for Covid -19 Mk I
We are now being attacked by Covid-19 Mk V
And just like the flu vaccine that needs to be tweeked annually the Covid vaccines will need to be tweeked to make it more effective against the current variant.
This is one of the reasons why I am a firm believer in erradication because this will be never ending particularly if we allow it to run rampant in third world countries so provide a breeding platform for more nasty variants to thrive .
As for research, you need to understand that anything other than the actual source is hearsay & opinion so what you have to read is the actual clinical reports, not some ones interpretations of the clinical reports.
So the only thing opinions should be based on is what is found as first hand reporting in medical & scientific journals.
Give me any clinical data and I can extrapolate totally different conclusions depending upon my beliefs or who is paying me to alter your beliefs .
Even then you have to be critical
Any graph without error bars and not showing all the data ( including the points that don't fit ) is to be considered suspect .
reading the same misrepresentation repeated by 200,000 different people does not make it correct .

Information comes in many forms but it is only the PRIMARY information that can be trusted and even then you have to look carefully at it.
Most of what we get in the medial is tertiary at best and usually 4th generation and then 5th generation opinion on the 4th generation reporting.

VAXXED Patients' Blood Examined, Horrific Findings Revealed by German Physicians! - Rumble

 

[fixit1ddh]

VAXXED Patients' Blood Examined, Horrific Findings Revealed by German Physicians! - Rumble

Not sure what you are trying to say or where you got those numbers from but they look rather like someone made them up then they have been cross posted 10,000 times because some people want them to be correct.
The vaccine is as safe as it can be made and most of the resistance is simply "Fear of the new" which is quite normal
At one time it was a well known undispituted fact that having electric lights in your home would drive you mad and give your children brain cancer .
Now the original vaccine formula was designed for Covid -19 Mk I
We are now being attacked by Covid-19 Mk V
And just like the flu vaccine that needs to be tweeked annually the Covid vaccines will need to be tweeked to make it more effective against the current variant.
This is one of the reasons why I am a firm believer in erradication because this will be never ending particularly if we allow it to run rampant in third world countries so provide a breeding platform for more nasty variants to thrive .
As for research, you need to understand that anything other than the actual source is hearsay & opinion so what you have to read is the actual clinical reports, not some ones interpretations of the clinical reports.
So the only thing opinions should be based on is what is found as first hand reporting in medical & scientific journals.
Give me any clinical data and I can extrapolate totally different conclusions depending upon my beliefs or who is paying me to alter your beliefs .
Even then you have to be critical
Any graph without error bars and not showing all the data ( including the points that don't fit ) is to be considered suspect .
reading the same misrepresentation repeated by 200,000 different people does not make it correct .

Information comes in many forms but it is only the PRIMARY information that can be trusted and even then you have to look carefully at it.
Most of what we get in the medial is tertiary at best and usually 4th generation and then 5th generation opinion on the 4th generation reporting.

 

[MParr]

Where’s the dead horse?

 

[bertsmobile1]

VAXXED Patients' Blood Examined, Horrific Findings Revealed by German Physicians! - Rumble

Thank you for posting that link, very interesting and definately worth a deeper look.
Unfortunately there was no link to the source material other than a mention of the doctors names and of course without them in print, near impossible to find so they could be checked.
I think I found them but it is in German with no English translation does Dr Ruby speak German or did she rely on a translation ? It appears the Dr Ghitalla is in fact an Md but again , no indication what her practice is and what institution it is from , if it is indeed from one , and that is very important, remember all of the doctors who told you smoking was good for you ?
It appears that Dr Bolland is a naturopath so I have difficulty in taking what he says about main stream medacine as creditable
As a holder of a MSc in Applied Science the next problem was none of the slides shown had the magnifications or methods indicated which is vital and basic good practice even from first year trainees. And even worse they are not simple blood smeers . One is a standard through lit slide and one is a flurograph . All the others are stock photos , not the patients blood and are stock Transmission electron microscope images of rouleaux .
THis is important as the "spiral" could have been a paper shred, a hair , a contaminant picked up in collection or preparation of the slide or even crud inside the microscope ( it happens ) .
Several times Dr Ruby says they are standard slides
Next, there was no mention why the doctor was doing blood smeeres on her patients in the first place and what other medical conditions / or medications the Doctors patients were on , again very important .
What Dr Ruby said about rouleaux is basically wrong, and in particular the rubbish about reversing the polarity, If they all swapped from - to + then they would still repel .Then she takes a single reason why rouleaux is seen as proof of the vaccine ( which ever one they are talking about ) causing cancer . I have seen it blood samples from foundry workers back in the 70's when I was monitoring them for heavy metal posioning and none of them had cancer or covid vaccine for that matter.
I strongly suggest readers research rouleaux either in Wikkipedia or any haematology web page
To be a valid result that could be extrapolated to the entire general population 1,500 people need to be selected at random to give you 99,9% certaincy that the results obtained are indicative of the entire population. Keep that number in your head it is a very important one to enable you to rule out stacked research being applied to an entire population.
Next there was no mention which vaccine her patients had been treated with .
As for the slide of the vaccine , that is total rubbish, if you don't know what is supposed to be in the solution you can not start to analyse it with a simple drip slide
I did a search on Dr Jane Ruby, but could not find what her qualifications actually were which is always a worry with media doctors.
However I did come across a mention of her in Health Feedback debunking two previous attempts to spread untruths
Try as I could I could not find any other reference to the story on Stew Peters because as previously mentioned you HAVE TO CHECK THE SOURCE MATERIAL because what a commentator says about it is often coloured by their opinions & political agenda
Then I found this quote on Dr Ruby's own blog which is more than worrying about her objectivity

Yes, the Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia – the grossly, far Left, blackface, babykiller, communist Democrat, Ralph Northam. I felt an icy chill run down my spine.

 

[longhike]

Those that have been convinced to not get a vaccine are the victims. They are susceptible to manipulation and preyed upon because they are consumed by fear, prejudice, and conspiracies. And they are dying as a result.

Covid is just the most recent topic of the fear mongering conspiracies. And the answer is no, Dr Ruby is not an MD.

How many of these did or do you believe in?

Bill Gates created
Bill Gates GPS
5G
Pandemic created by deep state
Created by big pharma
Death rates inflated
It doesn’t actually exist
It’s a bio weapon
Plandemic

or treatments?

Vitamin supplements
Sunlight
Bleach
Colloidal Silver
Ivermectin
hydroxychloroquine

At some point you have ask yourself the question… nah, probably not.

Get a shot. Protect your neighbor. And go fix your lawnmower.

 

[fixit1ddh]

Thank you for posting that link, very interesting and definately worth a deeper look.
Unfortunately there was no link to the source material other than a mention of the doctors names and of course without them in print, near impossible to find so they could be checked.
I think I found them but it is in German with no English translation does Dr Ruby speak German or did she rely on a translation ? It appears the Dr Ghitalla is in fact an Md but again , no indication what her practice is and what institution it is from , if it is indeed from one , and that is very important, remember all of the doctors who told you smoking was good for you ?
It appears that Dr Bolland is a naturopath so I have difficulty in taking what he says about main stream medacine as creditable
As a holder of a MSc in Applied Science the next problem was none of the slides shown had the magnifications or methods indicated which is vital and basic good practice even from first year trainees. And even worse they are not simple blood smeers . One is a standard through lit slide and one is a flurograph . All the others are stock photos , not the patients blood and are stock Transmission electron microscope images of rouleaux .
THis is important as the "spiral" could have been a paper shred, a hair , a contaminant picked up in collection or preparation of the slide or even crud inside the microscope ( it happens ) .
Several times Dr Ruby says they are standard slides
Next, there was no mention why the doctor was doing blood smeeres on her patients in the first place and what other medical conditions / or medications the Doctors patients were on , again very important .
What Dr Ruby said about rouleaux is basically wrong, and in particular the rubbish about reversing the polarity, If they all swapped from - to + then they would still repel .Then she takes a single reason why rouleaux is seen as proof of the vaccine ( which ever one they are talking about ) causing cancer . I have seen it blood samples from foundry workers back in the 70's when I was monitoring them for heavy metal posioning and none of them had cancer or covid vaccine for that matter.
I strongly suggest readers research rouleaux either in Wikkipedia or any haematology web page
To be a valid result that could be extrapolated to the entire general population 1,500 people need to be selected at random to give you 99,9% certaincy that the results obtained are indicative of the entire population. Keep that number in your head it is a very important one to enable you to rule out stacked research being applied to an entire population.
Next there was no mention which vaccine her patients had been treated with .
As for the slide of the vaccine , that is total rubbish, if you don't know what is supposed to be in the solution you can not start to analyse it with a simple drip slide
I did a search on Dr Jane Ruby, but could not find what her qualifications actually were which is always a worry with media doctors.
However I did come across a mention of her in Health Feedback debunking two previous attempts to spread untruths
Try as I could I could not find any other reference to the story on Stew Peters because as previously mentioned you HAVE TO CHECK THE SOURCE MATERIAL because what a commentator says about it is often coloured by their opinions & political agenda
Then I found this quote on Dr Ruby's own blog which is more than worrying about her objectivity

I'm done with this. Going back to lawnmower repairs. Some people are just two mainstream media brainwashed.

 

[MParr]