I didn't intend to get anything started, and I agree with everything that was said. How far do we have to go to insure someone doesn't hurt themselves on your equipment? We are a suit happy culture. There was a case in this area not too many years ago where an individual broke into a service yard that was surrounded by a 6' chain link fence and a locked gate. That individual injured themselves while inside the yard and successfully sued the business for that injury. The only way to insure you absolutely can not be sued for anything is to not be there at all, and that's not an option if you're putting food on the table. The fact is that you can be sued for just about anything. Another example from my hometown two years ago. An individual was walking in a parking lot and hit their shin on a receiver hitch that was on a truck. They called the police who then proceeded to leave a citation for the truck owner. I don't remember the official wording, but basically it stated the citation was issued because the hitch protruded beyond the factory boundaries of the bumpers and therefore presented a hazard to anyone walking by. That leads me to question, is the tailgate being down beyond the factory boundaries of the truck because it sticks out past the bumper? Getting back on topic and using this logic, one could argue the entire trailer is beyond the factory boundaries of the truck, or at the least the gate is beyond the factory boundary of the trailer. Like you all said, where does it end?!?!?!
In the end, using your flashers if you're parking along the street to warn other drivers that the vehicle is stationary is about the best thing you can do, other than putting actual flashing amber lights on your trucks. Also, the use of cones in the front and rear will not only help leave you open space to load/unload and to pull out, but will also help warn pedestrians there are hazards in the area. Does any of this stuff insure nothing will happen? No. However, if you ever find yourself in court, and hopefully you'll have a judge with some common sense, two questions will have to be answered. 1. Were you, the operator, placing your equipment in such a manner as to present an undue hazard to others in the immediate area? 2. Did you do everything reasonable to warn others in the immediate area that a hazard existed? In most cases, the "reasonable and prudent person" is the test. As long as you go beyond what a "reasonable and prudent person" would do, regardless of how ridiculous it seems, you should be okay.
Just my $.02 worth and very well could be worth exactly what you've paid for it. :laughing: