OK, there is a certain logic to this, especially if the oil indicated in the manufacturer's manual contains mineral and synthetic oils or if you use a synthetic oil on an older engine, even if it has similar viscosity.
It turns out that synthetic oils are less viscous (compared to minerals), and in a cold engine the clearances are a little larger than in a hot engine, the synthetic molecules are more homogeneous and adhere more to the contact surfaces.
With these assumptions and thinking about the oil on the piston walls, a greater amount of oil remains stuck (at the inlet), and is released by the entry of the gasoline + air mixture, participating in the burning at the time of the explosion in a volume greater than the mineral, hence the greater loss.
If, on the one hand, synthetics are more efficient in lubricating and protecting parts, on the other, they are more expensive and have a higher consumption, which is not always seen in smoke... there is no way to make fried eggs without breaking eggs... .