My furthest is 9 miles.. I start at the farthest out and work my way back in
That makes sense and got me to thinking(which can be dangerous:0) I've never rendered a residential service like mowing commercially, but my analytical nature would tend to have me:
1)Limit the distance to 10 miles from my home in all directions, East; West, North & South.
2)Acquire customers in each direction beginning at the furthest point and working back to the epicenter(my home).
3)Decide upon the least dense customer base(# of yards) direction and begin servicing from my home outward.
4)At the furthest point in that direction(i.e. East), I would then travel directly to the furthest point of next adjacent least dense customer base direction(i.e. North or South) and work my way inward toward my home.
5)Once I reached the "epicenter", I would procede outward into the next adjacent unserviced direction(i.e. West).
6)Upon completion of the 3rd direction outward(Step 5 above), I would again travel directly to the furthest point of the last customer base direction(i.e. North or South would remain depending on the direction taken in Step 4) and complete my customers' servicing inward ending up back at my home.
Have any of you that mow commercially performed a similar analysis of direction travel from your home similar to this??? Would this not provide the least fuel consumption by the hauling vehicle, by never needing to "back-track" in any direction from your home? Is there a consideration that I am not including in my "travel theory"??? Of course this would not work if any customers required certain days of the week for their yards to be mowed that would not be conducive to a specific daily route as I described. So, critcize my theory and enlighten me to the "real world" of lawn maintenance and how you approach the travel route(s) to customers each day you go out:0)