That makes some sense. In most cases I would rather buy the thing that will last the longest, but maybe sometimes it would be better to buy cheap things. Like for example say you want to buy a mower and can't decide between a $1,000 mower and a $200 mower. Say you don't have to really make many repairs, it just bites the dust one day, and you go through this process 3 times throughout your career, you would save some money since you didn't buy the $1,000 mower that would last you the whole time. But we don't live in a perfect world, so a mower usually doesn't just bite the dust and you have to replace it. Usually things start to break, you fix them, another thing breaks, you fix that, then you might need a new mower. But by the time you get your repair bills it might be the same cost as buying a mower that will last longer. So if I can I will usually buy something that will last a long time unless I won't be using it much at all.
I once worked for a man that was one of the top 100 wealthiest people in the US. One day we listening to him talk concerning some financial things in the factory where we worked for him. His parents came to the US right after WWII as immigrants and built much wealth in industry. He made a statement that I will never forget. He said that his father who had built much of the businesses had always said, "I would rather buy 100 one dollar watches than one one hundred dollar watch." In other words many times he would buy what many people said were cheap off brand machines that would get by but not last as long many times as the expensive ones.
That carries over to our businesses like cutting grass. We are taught to always by the best name brands because they are quality...... The idea from his perspective would be buy as cheap as possible to get the job done but it might not have the longevity...... Has anybody else ever heard of this type discussion?
That thought worked for them, they became very successful.
His father said, "I would rather buy 100 one dollar watches than one one hundred dollar watch" and yes that maybe true if your in the market to sell but I don't believe it would be the same when it comes to having dependable and reliable equipment to work with day in day out.
With that said you have to understand that just because someone buys the best equipment for lawn care that he can doesn't mean they're any guarantees it will last forever.
To be successful in lawn care you need two things, A good work ethic one and Good equipment, but most importantly equipment you believe in, whether it's Stihl, Homelite or anything in between it doesn't matter as long as it works for you, does the job and your happy, you're successful.
There is something called the point of diminishing returns, where additional cost buys you very little in added quality. There is also a lower bound point where equipment is totally unreliable junk that is worthless for use in a business. For example, it is pretty hard to find a decent gas powered walk behind lawn mower for under $200, but for $400 you can get something decent that will be durable and reliable. If you pay $800 for a basic mower it won't be twice as good as a $400 mower.
I had always before hearing that one been taught that the high middle of the price range was usually the best deal. I had always been taught that it would probably be of the same quality of the highest priced but not have a few of the bells and whistles that the more expensive one had which usually would cause problems quicker anyway.......
I know of a few operators who have bought expensive lawnmowers but have been quite rough in the way they use them thinking that if it cost so much
I know of a few operators who have bought expensive lawnmowers but have been quite rough in the way they use them thinking that if it cost so much - it will be able to last nomatter what, after a few times in my shop they soon realise that if they slow down & take it easy then repair costs are lower.
Also there are the poerators who buy the cheapest trimmer for contracting & use it with care - the machine is hardly ever in the shop & they think it's the best machine ever built.
Now that makes perfect sense as well. I see a lot of people on different places that leave reviews on equipment telling how big of a piece of junk it is and the next person down will leave a review telling how good it is. Even the lower end equipment many times will do a good job if it is taken care of and not abused while the best most expensive equipment will die on you if misused.
Its all down to brand advertising.
People think because its got a certain name then all of it must be good.
Each manufacturer have good and bad product to different users.
Usually you can find certain product at good prices that can do the job.
I sell a certain mower which is a good push and self propelled model but the variable speed model is a letdown.
The problem with reviews is that most are based on the person expectations of the equipment. 90% of the people don't know if a piece of equipment is good or bad. Suppose you have a review done by some who just bought a Homelite Trimmer and his review reads there the greatest trimmer ever and he highly recommends this trimmer.
The first thing I'd like to ask the guy is have you ever run a Stihl or an Echo and chances are great that he hasn't so how can he say or give a review on a piece of equipment when he has never run anything to compare it to. Reviews especially public reviews are worthless.:thumbdown:
Anoher wise saying that has not been mentioned is time is money. If you are using unreliable equipment that breaks down alot you are not making money in idle time especially when you are paying employees sitting idle due to it. Also cost of repair has to be factored in. Some people will spend a dollar to save a dime if you know what I mean. You have to balance out all these factors.
The problem with reviews is that most are based on the person expectations of the equipment. 90% of the people don't know if a piece of equipment is good or bad. Suppose you have a review done by some who just bought a Homelite Trimmer and his review reads there the greatest trimmer ever and he highly recommends this trimmer.
The first thing I'd like to ask the guy is have you ever run a Stihl or an Echo and chances are great that he hasn't so how can he say or give a review on a piece of equipment when he has never run anything to compare it to. Reviews especially public reviews are worthless.:thumbdown:
I think what you have to do with reviews is read 10-20 to make a comparison from different users.
Also listen to what a couple of dealers have to say. Ok some dealers only want to sell you whats in their showroom but some will sell whats good for the conditions.
Also many times you don't have as many people give a good review but you have many that have a bad experience that are frustrated and want to vent and that is a place to vent. Also many times the person venting will be a first time user that is clueless. Also it is like a review I read on a chainsaw. Think it was a Husky. I would be willing to bet that the chain was on it backwards and he was ranting about it not cutting.........
yep seen that quite a few times.I would be willing to bet that the chain was on it backwards and he was ranting about it not cutting.........
The problem with machinery is if they are not setup properly at pdi.
Consumers buy lawnmowers from big supermarket type stores at a cheap price but in a box.
They take it home, fit the handles the wrong way, add the wrong oil or no oil and usually the wrong fuel ie old fuel with no stabliser.
The engine runs rough, the machine dosent drive properly and customer then blames that brand.
Also with the engine running rough they think its a warranty when if they bought from a dealer they "should" be advised accordingly.
The problem with machinery is if they are not setup properly at pdi.
Consumers buy lawnmowers from big supermarket type stores at a cheap price but in a box.
They take it home, fit the handles the wrong way, add the wrong oil or no oil and usually the wrong fuel ie old fuel with no stabliser.
The engine runs rough, the machine dosent drive properly and customer then blames that brand.
Also with the engine running rough they think its a warranty when if they bought from a dealer they "should" be advised accordingly.
My hate is chainsaws from same as above.
They attempt to fit bar and chain and iv seen all different ways they do it.
Chainsaws should only be sold by dealers imo due to they are dangerous equipment.
Every box has a book enclosed labeled instructions that if followed would prevent 99% of these problems.:2cents:
Every box has a book enclosed labeled instructions that if followed would prevent 99% of these problems.:2cents:
Not necessarily. The instructions that came with my Husqvarna 7021P push mower with the Honda GCV160 gas engine was full of serious errors and omissions that if followed would have surely ruined the engine. The instructions said to measure the oil level with the dipstick screwed in, which would have underfilled the crankcase, since the proper method is to do it without screwing the dipstick into the engine. The instructions said to change the oil every 25 hours with no mention of the important initial break in oil change after the first 5 hours of use. The instructions said to replace the spark plug with an NGK BPR6ES, which is the wrong (colder) heat range and is meant only for use in pressure washers. The correct plug is an NGK BPR5ES, which is hotter. Fortunately, the Honda engine instructions were also included, but I suspect most owners would not bother to read it and just read the Husqvarna manual.
I went through the same thing with the Honda manuals. As well as some others like Briggs and Stratton and Kohler, they all do the same things with there manuals. What you have to remember is that the manuals are set up for as many as three or four different engines. You'll find all the information for your mower there, checking oil, spark plug replacement will be there and it will be correct.
You stated the instructions said to measure the oil level with the dipstick screwed in, which would have under-filled the crankcase, since the proper method is to do it without screwing the dipstick into the engine. That would be true on some models but not all. The Kohler engines for example depending on the dipstick whether it's a screw in type or a push in can make a difference on how it and the oil should be checked.
I strongly suspect that there is a similarity to my kitchen faucet,no?
slumlord;90330 The engines are different at the box stores as well. The engine numbers from a Briggs or Tecumseh are different from the box stores than the small dealer who sells that brand to the customer .I strongly suspect that there is a similarity to my kitchen faucet said:No there usually is no difference with the engines. Different cover maybe but not the engine.
Briggs for example make approx 15 million engines a year give or take and the difference between them is usually a sticker or cover between different manufacturers.
A dealer can usually sell exactly the same product that a box store sells but usually more expensive as the box store is buying in bulk.
When it comes to buying a mower, Whats more important?
The deck or the engine?
No there usually is no difference with the engines. Different cover maybe but not the engine.
Briggs for example make approx 15 million engines a year give or take and the difference between them is usually a sticker or cover between different manufacturers.
A dealer can usually sell exactly the same product that a box store sells but usually more expensive as the box store is buying in bulk.
When it comes to buying a mower, Whats more important?
The deck or the engine?
When it comes to buying a mower, Whats more important?
The deck or the engine?
If he had cheap labor to keep his cheep junky machinery operating why not . And I can just hear his next statement . - with tears nearly running down his cheeks, I can only afford to pay .25 cents an hour - . If his employees were union organized the probability of the original statement being modified to a great degree is probable .I once worked for a man that was one of the top 100 wealthiest people in the US. One day we listening to him talk concerning some financial things in the factory where we worked for him. His parents came to the US right after WWII as immigrants and built much wealth in industry. He made a statement that I will never forget. He said that his father who had built much of the businesses had always said, "I would rather buy 100 one dollar watches than one one hundred dollar watch." In other words many times he would buy what many people said were cheap off brand machines that would get by but not last as long many times as the expensive ones.
That carries over to our businesses like cutting grass. We are taught to always by the best name brands because they are quality...... The idea from his perspective would be buy as cheap as possible to get the job done but it might not have the longevity...... Has anybody else ever heard of this type discussion?
That thought worked for them, they became very successful.
If he had cheap labor to keep his cheep junky machinery operating why not . And I can just hear his next statement . - with tears nearly running down his cheeks, I can only afford to pay .25 cents an hour - . If his employees were union organized the probability of the original statement being modified to a great degree is probable .
I say the deck welded is better but stamped is just as easy to fix.
Sent from my iPhone using LMF
Everyone seemed to talk about maintenance, repair, and longevity. What about quality of cut (or whatever the item is designed to do) and operation? A lot of times the better (usually more expensive) item performs the task better than the lesser item in addition to being better built (more durable). I'm talking about such criteria as smoother cut or better clippings distribution or better mulching for a mower.