djdicetn
Lawn Addict
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2012
- Threads
- 12
- Messages
- 2,193
OK, guys....I was gonna start a POLL thread, but never having done that before I figured I would mess it up:0)
So I am starting this thread which will most likely make some of you mad at me, some of you will utilize it to vent and some of you will even agree with my twisted perception of how governing bodies should/should not "dictate" additional constraints on a Lawn Maintenance business. Here goes:
A recent broadcast on a local network news program reported a lawn care maintenance professional who died when his John Deere Zero Turn overturned. The pictures of this "Commercial mower", as the news reported, had no ROPS. I don't know if indeed it was a "Commercial" John Deere model or not by what I saw on the news but I did notice the lack of a ROPS. Sooooooooo, should there be a "law" that fines a lawn care service if their mowers do not meet "safety requirements"? For this discussion, let's drop the debate of what constitutes a "professional lawn care maintenance" person and just go on the premise that this law would govern anyone who receives money for mowing a lawn(or the "owner" should it be a company with a license). I'll bet that if this news story was indeed a "licensed/insured lawn maintenance services company", that their insurance company just sent them a letter of their coverage being cancelled. Also, should the dealer that sold a "Commercial" ZTR to a lawn service(or individual that had the intent to mow lawns for money)without a ROPS be held liable as well? I say that because when I recently considered the purchase of a Bad Boy Outlaw(which is considered a "Commercial" model of that brand), all of the pictures on the Bad Boy website showed it with a ROPS(but there was no specific mention of it in the "specs") only to find the Outlaw at the dealer did not "come with one" and the dealer wanted an extra $300 for it(that didn't go over too well with me:0) And........if we shift gears and assume we are the deceased guy's wife in this news story, who do we decide to sue over this(unless he signed an employment waiver of liability)? Everyone knows what a legalistic society we live in(can you spell hot coffee in a McDonald's drive-thru) and that kind of repercussion is bound to happen.
Now......I'm ready to be "blasted" by any ignorance on my part(I reserve the right to be wrong) of any existing licensing/insurance coverage details that already deals with this "safety issue". Personally, I think there needs to be some accountability at the dealer level and regulations at the business level, but I can be swayed by overwhelming arguments as to why not. And I am very curious as to the opinions about this subject that many of the other users on these forums have about this topic as well as adding details and other perspectives and/or "what ifs". Have at it guys!!!!
So I am starting this thread which will most likely make some of you mad at me, some of you will utilize it to vent and some of you will even agree with my twisted perception of how governing bodies should/should not "dictate" additional constraints on a Lawn Maintenance business. Here goes:
A recent broadcast on a local network news program reported a lawn care maintenance professional who died when his John Deere Zero Turn overturned. The pictures of this "Commercial mower", as the news reported, had no ROPS. I don't know if indeed it was a "Commercial" John Deere model or not by what I saw on the news but I did notice the lack of a ROPS. Sooooooooo, should there be a "law" that fines a lawn care service if their mowers do not meet "safety requirements"? For this discussion, let's drop the debate of what constitutes a "professional lawn care maintenance" person and just go on the premise that this law would govern anyone who receives money for mowing a lawn(or the "owner" should it be a company with a license). I'll bet that if this news story was indeed a "licensed/insured lawn maintenance services company", that their insurance company just sent them a letter of their coverage being cancelled. Also, should the dealer that sold a "Commercial" ZTR to a lawn service(or individual that had the intent to mow lawns for money)without a ROPS be held liable as well? I say that because when I recently considered the purchase of a Bad Boy Outlaw(which is considered a "Commercial" model of that brand), all of the pictures on the Bad Boy website showed it with a ROPS(but there was no specific mention of it in the "specs") only to find the Outlaw at the dealer did not "come with one" and the dealer wanted an extra $300 for it(that didn't go over too well with me:0) And........if we shift gears and assume we are the deceased guy's wife in this news story, who do we decide to sue over this(unless he signed an employment waiver of liability)? Everyone knows what a legalistic society we live in(can you spell hot coffee in a McDonald's drive-thru) and that kind of repercussion is bound to happen.
Now......I'm ready to be "blasted" by any ignorance on my part(I reserve the right to be wrong) of any existing licensing/insurance coverage details that already deals with this "safety issue". Personally, I think there needs to be some accountability at the dealer level and regulations at the business level, but I can be swayed by overwhelming arguments as to why not. And I am very curious as to the opinions about this subject that many of the other users on these forums have about this topic as well as adding details and other perspectives and/or "what ifs". Have at it guys!!!!
Last edited by a moderator: