This is going nowhere and not making a lick of sense. And NO bert we aren't a bunch of killers shooting each other, you have the wrong country. As I said earlier its just crazy talking. Yes I do own guns but for sport only and I do have some deer meat in the freezer.
Well in a country of 300,000,000 I would hope there was at least 1 person with the right attitude to firearms.
I do not own any but have occasionaly gone shooting & am not a bad shot.
The hunters I go with all use single shot high velocity rifles.
The professionals who come out to shoot rabbits also use single shot rifles , many of them WW II .303 Enfields with a small magazine .
Equipted thus they can manage 200 rabbits a night regularly where as if we spotlight and neck break we are hard put to bag 50 a night.
A friend ran a chicken farm and he used a double barrel shot gun for snakes and a .22 for foxes.
A red fox skin with a single head shot is worth $ 5
His children used the pump action till they were in their early teens, mainly in case they missed cause angry brown snakes are not fun .
I am not a prude when to comes to firearms and firmly believe in the Swiss model where every person has to do manditory fire arms courses and every house has to have a long arm for every male occupant.
Then have the lowest firearms accidents & injuries of any country in the world, including here where firearms & crossbows are heavily restricted.
I can not find any reason why any person in a civilized country under a reasonable rule of law enforced by a reasonable & accountable police force would require rapid fire large capacity assult weapons.
If you have any, I would be interested to hear them.
While I have never actively served I have trained & we were taught the purpose of rapid fire was to keep the enemy pinned down so they could be out flanked, surrounded or targeted by artillary .
And yes this thread has gone into the relems of lunacy