I went to the Husqvarna dealership today to look at the M-ZT today, but they were closed. I was glad because it is easier to look without having someone up your back. When I got home I did the research on this machine. So far it seems for the price that the internet gives you, it would be better in comparison to the Kommander. This is my thought process
Husqvarna is 1 hp better than the Kommander, but I do not know the difference between the briggs and kohler engines
Husqvarna has a blade tip speed of 19,000 compared to 18,100
Husqvarna has ZT 3400 Hydro-Gear compared to ZT 3100 (Are both of these serviceable?)
faster ground speed
foldable ROPS
I want to test drive to see how it handles first before I decide
Any thoughts on these two models?
I just want to make a decision soon. I have 4 acres to mow and my cub cadet LTX1042 just doesn't make the job any faster since I have bought this property and I do not want to spend $8000+ for a commercial mower.
And may I add Gravely and Hustler are not options...I do not have anything against them, I just to not have any dealers in my area.
Husqvarna is 1 hp better than the Kommander, but I do not know the difference between the briggs and kohler engines
Husqvarna has a blade tip speed of 19,000 compared to 18,100
Husqvarna has ZT 3400 Hydro-Gear compared to ZT 3100 (Are both of these serviceable?)
faster ground speed
foldable ROPS
I want to test drive to see how it handles first before I decide
Any thoughts on these two models?
I just want to make a decision soon. I have 4 acres to mow and my cub cadet LTX1042 just doesn't make the job any faster since I have bought this property and I do not want to spend $8000+ for a commercial mower.
And may I add Gravely and Hustler are not options...I do not have anything against them, I just to not have any dealers in my area.