TerraForte
Member
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2019
- Threads
- 7
- Messages
- 33
I also inspected it quite thoroughly before installing it.
There were obvious differences between the knock-off and genuine Stihl carb, for sure. Such as the part line made from the casting mold. The metal quality looks subpar to the original. It was not de-burred as well, but still more than satisfactory.
The mating surface, although not cosmetically perfect, seals fine, which is all that matters.
The 'velocity stack' of the inlet opening was smooth enough for my taste.
It's a dang good replica that would be indistinguishable from the original in the eyes of 95% of the population. It's also indistinguishable in performance as far as I can tell. And I got a pretty dang good feel for this stuff after 9 years of tinkering on cars, small engine equipment, engineering school, etc. I can hear a sputtering idle, struggling to make power, bogging, popping, bearing noises, etc where other people, even after repeatedly trying to point it out, can't hear anything. Not trying to brag, it's just something that comes with years of running engines. I suppose similar to how I'm musically retarded. People say "can't you just determine the notes of a song by ear?" and I just can't. Not if my life depended on it.
In addition, the adjustment screws are MUCH better. Simple flathead type screws vs the stupid Stihl screws that break immediately. I understand that may be EPA influenced, but still frustrating as far as it concerns my user-experience.
It's quite impressive actually. You can literally slap it on and go. A 5 minute swap out. This is not typically the case in other areas, such as replica car parts. Those usually have fitment issues, need to be 'tweaked', don't fit at all, etc. I've run into that so many times.
I don't think very highly of "genuine Stihl" carburetors (more accurately, Zama, I suppose) at this point anyway. Every single Stihl tool I've owned (all used, I admit) has hard carb issues, as well as about 75% of them for sale on craigslist.
It's a concerning issue when the knock-off carburetor market is so strong due to the demand...
One thing I am concerned about though is the seemingly universal-ity of these carbs.
I purchased the carb for this trimmer, a FS85 RX. It's got the 25cc motor. Okay fine. That carb is tuned for a 25cc motor. And Stihl puts their 25cc motor in multiple different tools. Fine.
But these carbs for sale say they fit like 40 different tools. Which is a bit...curious, in my opinion.
There is undoubtedly very specific tuning differences that Stihl made between various tools. Such as a lightweight string trimmer that's supposed to scream, vs. a pole saw that needs power down low, maybe.
I also bought a carb for my FC95 edger, which is a heavy-duty commercial tool with decent power. The listing said it also fit FS45 trimmers, which is a silly, low-end curved shaft homeowner trimmer.
So...eh
There were obvious differences between the knock-off and genuine Stihl carb, for sure. Such as the part line made from the casting mold. The metal quality looks subpar to the original. It was not de-burred as well, but still more than satisfactory.
The mating surface, although not cosmetically perfect, seals fine, which is all that matters.
The 'velocity stack' of the inlet opening was smooth enough for my taste.
It's a dang good replica that would be indistinguishable from the original in the eyes of 95% of the population. It's also indistinguishable in performance as far as I can tell. And I got a pretty dang good feel for this stuff after 9 years of tinkering on cars, small engine equipment, engineering school, etc. I can hear a sputtering idle, struggling to make power, bogging, popping, bearing noises, etc where other people, even after repeatedly trying to point it out, can't hear anything. Not trying to brag, it's just something that comes with years of running engines. I suppose similar to how I'm musically retarded. People say "can't you just determine the notes of a song by ear?" and I just can't. Not if my life depended on it.
In addition, the adjustment screws are MUCH better. Simple flathead type screws vs the stupid Stihl screws that break immediately. I understand that may be EPA influenced, but still frustrating as far as it concerns my user-experience.
It's quite impressive actually. You can literally slap it on and go. A 5 minute swap out. This is not typically the case in other areas, such as replica car parts. Those usually have fitment issues, need to be 'tweaked', don't fit at all, etc. I've run into that so many times.
I don't think very highly of "genuine Stihl" carburetors (more accurately, Zama, I suppose) at this point anyway. Every single Stihl tool I've owned (all used, I admit) has hard carb issues, as well as about 75% of them for sale on craigslist.
It's a concerning issue when the knock-off carburetor market is so strong due to the demand...
One thing I am concerned about though is the seemingly universal-ity of these carbs.
I purchased the carb for this trimmer, a FS85 RX. It's got the 25cc motor. Okay fine. That carb is tuned for a 25cc motor. And Stihl puts their 25cc motor in multiple different tools. Fine.
But these carbs for sale say they fit like 40 different tools. Which is a bit...curious, in my opinion.
There is undoubtedly very specific tuning differences that Stihl made between various tools. Such as a lightweight string trimmer that's supposed to scream, vs. a pole saw that needs power down low, maybe.
I also bought a carb for my FC95 edger, which is a heavy-duty commercial tool with decent power. The listing said it also fit FS45 trimmers, which is a silly, low-end curved shaft homeowner trimmer.
So...eh