This resulted from a 2010 lawsuit a couple of manufacturers got caught playing with the HP ratings. Sears would put 23 hp stickers on a rider with a Kohler CV22 or another mower manufacturer had a spring stock up order for a 42 inch 17.5 hp mower but when the dealer got them, they had 15 hp engines and when the dealer contacted his source they sent him 17.5 hp stickers to cover up the 15 hp stickers.
Now by law they have to be measured against a known standard, and also if they change the hp rating on an engine there has to be some change with the engine. A different jet in the carb, or a different camshaft, etc. So this whole thing resulted in Briggs doing away with the hp rating on consumer engines and go to torque ratings. Some companies did totally away with torque and would just post the cc rating of the engine. Honda had to downgrade their hp ratings So the GX390 was 13 hp become 11 hp.
That's what I was thinking. Don't like that.Parts in the manufacturing stage are not the same parts that we get as replacement in most cases. They may use 6 different carbs for different hp ratings on the same size engine but will replace all those numbers with a single part number for replacement.Same with camshafts, or ignition modules.
As long as we're getting the biggest/best for replacement. A more powerful engine is ok with me.It is all about the logistics costs.
So you typically have 4 to 5 Hp ratings per capacity.
IF the difference is just a gasket or main jet then the logical thing to do is only supply the biggest one .
IT costs the same to make a 120 main jet as it does to make a 125, 130 135 145 but it costs 5 times that much to warehouse & distribute 5 different main jets and then you have all that slow moving dead stock sitting there , taking up 5 bins costing money , requiring stocktakes + the inevitable miss picks .
This is one of the very big reasons why Chinese stuff is so cheap, they do not supply spare parts for most of the stuff.
Whole engines or nothing .
BRiggs probably looses $ 10 on every main jet they distribute
Hey guys, I have the Quantum L-head (6.5) 12H802 on my Toro.
I bought this in Aug. 2000 , cut more than it's share and still cutting grass today.
It probably could use piston rings or needle bearings (if it has them) , wondering if it is worth putting $ into it ?
cost estimate ?... thanks
Well for RPMs there should be a spring attached to a tab that controls the carb throttle. If you bend the tap the RPMs will adjust. I don't remember which way you bend it right now but a little experimentation will help.thanks for your reply. , uses a little oil , was wondering about oil additive for the rings ? Almost always starts within 1-2 pulls.
, seems like it could run a little more RPM , any tricks there ?
thanks going to cut grass today so will look at tab/spring.
also noticed when I dug out a couple other blades ( I have 3,
the cutting edge on 1 of them looks to be about 8" while the other two about 6.5" ?
that seems to me it would be a bit lighter in weight therefore turn faster/ easier ?
As much as I would like to bore and rings, with my luck the drivetrain or something else would break .
Never had carb issues, use Seafoam or Mystery oil and Stabile occasionally, same as my other engines.
I also have an old Homelite trimlite that is almost 19 years old and still runs well .