Part of my yard is a 25 degree embankment. It has always been a challenge to mow. Twelve years ago I tried to use a lawn tractor. It would climb the embankment fine, but with the engine in front, it would slide down with one wheel going forward and the other spinning backward. Then I tried a Dixon ZTR. With the rear engine, it would also climb ok, but going down was frightening. It seemed like it would almost freewheel. I had to hold the lap bars slightly in reverse to keep it from running away. And I had virtually no steering control. So for years I have been mowing with a rear engine Snapper rider with aftermarket aggressive tires. It works ok, but when going uphill, the unweighted front end gives me very little steering control.
Now I have learned that Cub Cadet has recently released a new residential zero turn model (RZT-S) with steerable front wheels. The literature indicates that it might be just what I need. But since it still uses hydraulic drive like the Dixon, I have concerns (and three questions).
1. If I release the "drive" pedal (which controls the swash plate), will the mower stop when going downhill? Or will it freewheel like the old Dixon? In other words, will the EZT transaxle design allow the wheels to turn the hydraulic motor and push oil through the system even though the pump swash plate is in "neutral", allowing the mower to roll downhill?
2. Is the EZT transaxle robust enough to withstand mowing a 25 degree embankment on a periodic basis? The slope is only about 3600 sq ft and mowed every two weeks in the summer. And because of safety concerns, I always go very slow. I assume that going slow puts less stress on the transaxle.
3. Since the dual EZT transaxles do not act like a typical differential, am I correct in thinking that I should get better traction going both up AND down the slope? If I loose traction with one tire on my Snapper, the drive force (or braking force) of the other tire is severely impaired. I frequently skid down the slope with one tire spinning backwards and the other freewheeling. But since the EZT transaxles are separate units, I would expect to have "independent" traction with each tire.
Thanks for any insight that the forum can provide.
Now I have learned that Cub Cadet has recently released a new residential zero turn model (RZT-S) with steerable front wheels. The literature indicates that it might be just what I need. But since it still uses hydraulic drive like the Dixon, I have concerns (and three questions).
1. If I release the "drive" pedal (which controls the swash plate), will the mower stop when going downhill? Or will it freewheel like the old Dixon? In other words, will the EZT transaxle design allow the wheels to turn the hydraulic motor and push oil through the system even though the pump swash plate is in "neutral", allowing the mower to roll downhill?
2. Is the EZT transaxle robust enough to withstand mowing a 25 degree embankment on a periodic basis? The slope is only about 3600 sq ft and mowed every two weeks in the summer. And because of safety concerns, I always go very slow. I assume that going slow puts less stress on the transaxle.
3. Since the dual EZT transaxles do not act like a typical differential, am I correct in thinking that I should get better traction going both up AND down the slope? If I loose traction with one tire on my Snapper, the drive force (or braking force) of the other tire is severely impaired. I frequently skid down the slope with one tire spinning backwards and the other freewheeling. But since the EZT transaxles are separate units, I would expect to have "independent" traction with each tire.
Thanks for any insight that the forum can provide.