goodolboydws....
Well, Kenny, I bow to your superior knowledge of Kubotas.
And if Kubotas (this one in particular) leave the rack solenoid for the FI pumps in the on position with the result that the path of additional fuel to the pump is uninterrupted all the time that their engines are off, that's another story. I'd thought that someone must have made a typo in the thread and had read it as actually being the other way.
Typically the gold standard for safety would have a fuel control solenoid always be in the UN-energized position disconnecting the fuel supply
whenever the ignition switch is off and the the engine isn't supposed to be running. Yes the relay would tend need to be heavier to last as long if it's wired in such a way that it's conducting power all the time that an engine's running,
and more prone to eventual failure for that reason, BUT it would be safer to have an engine that doesn't start than one that doesn't stop...... Sounds like a rather poor design choice from a safety standpoint.
That accessory shut off cable sounds good-I'd forgotten to add it to my list... I'd think of it as an "improvement" rather than a "workaround" though. (One less thing on-board to fail electrically.
)
And you're right I suppose for someone who's heavyhanded, grinding instead of using a purpose-designed cutting wheel in a Dremel type tool properly
could potentially cause vibration induced damage.
As I said earlier, I'm glad my 42 year young Ford 2000 diesel doesn't depend on any electrics to control it's fuel flow to the pump (either on or off).
Sometimes an elegant soution (elegent in it's engineering sense=simpler) shouldn't necessarily be abandoned, in this case it's apparently being done because Kubota or the Federal powers higher up the food chain thought enough people would be too dumb to be able to remember to simply pull a cable to the on/start/run position when starting the engine and then return it to to off position later and then back on again the next time. (That wouldn't surprise me seeing how the newer cars require less and less attention or input from drivers every year, and those vehicles have fewer and fewer serviceable parts too, many things now needing to be replaced rather than being maintained-which reflects on the apparent perception of the quality of available mechanics too.)
Does Kubota actually use a full submergence type internal potting of all of the individual components
within the control module itself, or is this module's body/case only hermetically sealed with an external epoxy coating to protect it from external introduction of water and other environmental contamination? From the "several cracks" comment that the original poster had made, full encapsulization doesn't sound as likely.
For those who haven't heard this before:
For heat transfer purposes a module often has either it's own heat sink being a part of the case or is attached via a relatively large contact area connection to an external metal heat sink surface, and between which surfaces is sometimes used a dielectric grease to ensure good contact, (this was commonly done with automotive ignition control modules for one example, and the engine compartment mounted modules tend to fail early if the grease layer was left or forceably washed out-can you say "careless use of a pressure washer"?).
When the primary concern is dampening vibration, modules often use either a semi-free suspension of components with cushioning (perhaps taped to wires in a wire harness) rather than having them be attached directly to a rigid piece subject to heavy vibration, or by using some sort of rubber-type isolation if being directly attached to a solid surface subject to such vibration.
Potting individual electronic or electrical components within a matrix of any solid, fairly non-resiliant material such as most epoxy recipies does very little if anything to dampen internal vibration of individual components to any significant degree-other than to possibly help retain the components themselves to a circuit board or internal connector. And doing this increases the possibility of causing a different problem
There are other materials available, but when using epoxy as a potting material it's most typically used as an insulator rather than a conductor, so it would more often than not tend to trap heat in the area immediately surrounding each individual component-with no way to disperse that heat, which would tend to magnify any overheating problem limited to a single component-or to everything inside the module's case for that matter. If overheating is not an issue for any of the components, (and especially if there is no relay/solenoid inside) full encapsulization might make more sense.
Modules are typically sealed externally or internallly, seldom both-but typically for different reasons.
thanks