After looking at many different mowers, I am leaning towards one of the following;
Snapper 550Z 52" (Engine Options = Kawasaki FR730V, 24HP or Briggs & Stratton Commercial Series, 25HP)
Gravely ZT HD 52" (Engine Options = Kawasaki FR691V, 23HP or Kohler 7000 series, 25HP)
Skag Freedom Z 52" (Only one engine option = Kohler 7000 series, 24HP)
I wouldn't base my choice on only what engine they had, but with the Snapper and Gravely there are a couple of engine choices. This is why I am curious if one of these engine series has had major issues or would last longer.
The Snapper and Gravely both have ZT-3100s, and the Skag has ZT-2800 but it also weighs less. The snapper does have greasable spindle bearings, but not sure if this will make them last longer, as it is still a residential series mower. They all seem to have heavy chain-hung mower decks. All three have 20" drive tires, the Gravely and Snapper have 13" front tires with the Skag having 11" front tires.
So all three mower options appear to be well made and similar in many ways, with the biggest difference between them being what engine to go with . . . this is why I ask if there is one that I should avoid. I have read here that many of B&S Commercial series have developed oil leaks, but not sure if that should sway my opinion of them. Thanks again for the help.
So I was getting some lumber for my project the other day and stumbled onto this beast: http://www.homedepot.com/p/Cub-Cade...-Mower-with-Bluetooth-RZT-L-46H-FAB/206495430
Can a "residential" guy ask for anything better then that?:thumbsup:
I gave it a "once over" and only thing I didn't like about that set up was the 2200 hundred series transmissions. I'd pay more $ for 3400's if they were available. Other then that...I liked it!
Someone may already have suggested this, but if I were you I'd look at a used commercial model instead of a new homeowner model. I paid $1800 for my Gravely Compact Pro 44, which sells for $5500 new. It had around 400 hours on it at the time of purchase.
Of the three models you posted, I'd go with the Gravely. :thumbsup:
You just cannot find anything under $3500 with serviceable hydrostatics and even at that price they would be ZT-2800s. I think this engine would be great, but maybe greater in a different make or model. If you read the online reviews of this exact mower, most give the engine praise over anything else. I would think a great mower would be great with any engine (Kaw, Briggs, Kohler, etc.) so long as it wasn't underpowered. But a really good engine alone cannot make an average mower great. At the end of the day, each person has to choose what is most important, engine, deck style, features, BTS, and so on. I think a 22-24 HP of most any newer v-twins are going to work just fine for most consumers if properly maintained. Little things like reading the ENGINE'S operators manual and not just the mowers will provide some insight into how to maintain based on the manufacturer who actually designed and engineered the engine. For example, I have seen in operators manuals where it says to reduce the engine to minimum throttle and let idle for at least 30 seconds before shutting the engine off. Who does this?
I have a question... why are you as a residential owner worrying about serviceable hydro-statics drives??
I personally don't worry about them as none of my mowers have had them. I was just saying that there are not many options below that price point with them. Having something that can be services should offer greater reliability/longer service life. Plus, you do not get anything over 7mph ground speed until you get up into a serviceable unit because of the higher capacity pump and what not. If someone wants to cut their mowing time down via increased speed, without the worry of being too hard on their machine, then a serviceable hydrostatic should help in that regard.
For example, I have seen in operators manuals where it says to reduce the engine to minimum throttle and let idle for at least 30 seconds before shutting the engine off. Who does this?