Export thread

John Deere S240 vs. Cub Cadet Enduro XT2 LX46

#1

S

Scott S

Hi....

I am considering purchasing one of these two mowers for mowing just under an acre of mostly flat residential turf which contains sections of Bermuda and fescue grass. There are some groups of trees on the property, but they should be able to easily be navigated with a lawn tractor. I have decided against getting a ZTR for this particular property. I am about to take over caring for my lawn mainly because I'm tired of the expense of having somebody else do it and I also now have the time since I just recently retired.

I have narrowed it down to two choices which I think will be adequate for weekly mowing during the season which runs about 8 months here:

1. John Deere S240 ($2299)

2. Cub Cadet Enduro XT2 LX46 ($1999)

Until about three weeks ago, I was completely sold on the recently redesigned John Deere S240 and was totally unfamiliar with Cub Cadet. This will be my first riding mower and I've always been partial to JD mainly because I like the way they look and they just seem to be a part of Americana.

However, after doing a lot of research, I thought it would be worth my time to consider Cub Cadet. I went to the local Cub Cadet dealer and drove the XT2 and that same day went to the JD dealer and drove the S240. I might add that it is almost impossible for a "newbie" to find any mower that doesn't have an equal number of positive and negative reviews. Regardless of the make or model, some swear by it and some swear at it.

So, that being said, I thought I would post similar messages on both the Cub Cadet and John Deere forums so I could get some additional information that will help me make a decision.

The Cub Cadet has a 46" deck with twin blades and anti-scalp wheels, is beefier and seems a bit more solid than the JD. I like where the fuel filler is located as the JD fuel filler is under the seat which makes it tough to fill if a bagger is attached and it is certainly a bit easier to remove the oil filter as the JD has a piece of plastic which gets in the way of getting a good grip on the filter. The CC also has a 3 year unlimited warranty vs. the JD which has a 3 year/200 hour warranty. However, in my situation, it is really a 3 year warranty as well because I won't exceed 200 hours in 3 years. I am aware that the S240 is based on a D series chassis.

The JD has a Kawasaki FS600V 18.5 hp engine which many people say is a superior engine (dependability, smoothness and quietness) as compared to the CC's 24 HP Kohler 7000 Series OHV engine with Smart-Choke. Some say it also helps the resale value as, for whatever reason, Kawasaki seems to have a better reputation with the general public. I'm not sure if that's true, but I've heard that from two different brand dealers who each sell tractors that come with Kohler, Kawasaki and Briggs and Stratton motors. In fairness, I also had one dealer tell me that all engine manufacturers go through periods where their products have both excellent and terrible years with the general public. Apparently, Kawasaki is enjoying a good period at this time. For a newbie like myself, it seems as if we're trying to find out which ice cream is better: vanilla or chocolate? There are millions of arguments for and against each one.

Both tractors have the Tuff Torq K-46 hydrostatic transmission.

The JD has a 42" deck with twin blades and anti-scalp wheels. The CC has armrests whereas the JD does not. Both have a great steering radius and turn easily although I might give the CC the edge in this area. The JD has a 2.4 gallon fuel tank vs. the CC having a 3 gallon tank. The JD has the floater type gauge on the frame whereas the CC doesn't have one at all but you can easily see the tank level through a slit.

I do not like the RIO switch on the JD. I think the CC is superior in both this area and the choke area.

The closest CC dealer is 23 miles away and I do not have access to a truck or trailer which means I'd have to pay the dealer to pickup and deliver the tractor for any maintenance issues. He will charge me $50 delivery and any future pickup/delivery will be $100 round trip. The JD dealer is 7 miles away and he will deliver it free and future pickup/delivery round trip costs will be $50.

So, reliability is even more important in my situation because not only will I have the hassle of not having the mower for up to 4 weeks at a time should it be in the shop during mowing season, but I'll also have the additional transportation expenses.

I have also read several posts where CC customer service is poor regarding warranty issues as everything seems to be ruled out due either normal wear and tear or user abuse e.g. hitting a tree root or using the mower for unintended purposes such as too large a property or rough terrain.

Between these two machines, I want the mower that will be the most reliable and will give the best cut. The JD is usually $2499, but there is a special offer of $200 off at this time. I also don't understand why there is a $500 premium with the CC to get the Kawasaki engine. If the dealer has a unit in stock with the Kawasaki, the price is $2499. The surcharge alone seems to indicate that the Kawasaki is a better engine, but then again this dealer said his mechanics have seen more issues with the Kawasaki engines vs. the Kohler. It should be noted that I spoke directly with the CC dealership owner for nearly 90 mins. regarding the CC.

I'm aware that this is being posted on the JD forum, but I would appreciate any impartial advice from your experience.

Thank you.

Scott

13YQA1CT010_product_detail_large.pngr4e001628-S240-642x462.png


#2

Glyn Robinson

Glyn Robinson

i would not buy anything cub cadet.


#3

S

Scott S

i would not buy anything cub cadet.

Thank you for the reply. Could you be a bit more specific as to why you wouldn't buy any Cub Cadet?


#4

Carscw

Carscw

i would not buy anything cub cadet.

Some info as to why would be helpful.


#5

BlazNT

BlazNT

Ok so first off I don't like the newer Deere stuff at all. They have cheapened most of the equipment they sell and still charge a premium for it.
Cub Cadet was purchased by MTD some years ago and left them alone to build their mowers and such. Now MTD is in direct control of Cub Cudet and is doing the same thing as John Deere. Now you know where I stand on each brand.

With that said it is now a difference of price and features. I like Kohler better than Kawasaki any day of the week. I like bigger stronger engines is why. HP to HP Kohler wins.
Bigger deck.
Nicer color.
Cub Cadet wins.

By the way your dealer is really who decides if something is covered under warranty unless CC gets involved. They don't get involved much.
So Get a good dealer.


#6

Carscw

Carscw

Ok so first off I don't like the newer Deere stuff at all. They have cheapened most of the equipment they sell and still charge a premium for it. Cub Cadet was purchased by MTD some years ago and left them alone to build their mowers and such. Now MTD is in direct control of Cub Cudet and is doing the same thing as John Deere. Now you know where I stand on each brand. With that said it is now a difference of price and features. I like Kohler better than Kawasaki any day of the week. I like bigger stronger engines is why. HP to HP Kohler wins. Bigger deck. Nicer color. Cub Cadet wins. By the way your dealer is really who decides if something is covered under warranty unless CC gets involved. They don't get involved much. So Get a good dealer.

I agree cub cadet is not as it once was. But I still feel they are the best riding mowers. But that could change next year.
They still use a cub frame.
I think most brands have gone overboard with trying to sell cheap.

Cup and JD are the most collectible mowers. With snapper right behind them.

I used snapper for years their push mowers was the best. Now they are no better then a Kmart brand.

Old cub cadet garden tractors is the most popular mower ever made. In 20 years I don't think we can say that.

JD just has never made a real good riding mower. They do have some nice zero turns. But way over priced like xmark.
They do have a nice 4 wheel steer but still lacks power to the deck.

Look at Sears/ craftsmen was the king for years. Now they are just mutts.

Heck I brag about my Toro's but will not be buying them this year. Was looking at bad boy but thinking bobcat now.


#7

S

Scott S

Ok so first off I don't like the newer Deere stuff at all. They have cheapened most of the equipment they sell and still charge a premium for it.
Cub Cadet was purchased by MTD some years ago and left them alone to build their mowers and such. Now MTD is in direct control of Cub Cudet and is doing the same thing as John Deere. Now you know where I stand on each brand.

With that said it is now a difference of price and features. I like Kohler better than Kawasaki any day of the week. I like bigger stronger engines is why. HP to HP Kohler wins.
Bigger deck.
Nicer color.
Cub Cadet wins.

By the way your dealer is really who decides if something is covered under warranty unless CC gets involved. They don't get involved much.
So Get a good dealer.

Thank you!


#8

S

Scott S

I agree cub cadet is not as it once was. But I still feel they are the best riding mowers. But that could change next year.
They still use a cub frame.
I think most brands have gone overboard with trying to sell cheap.

Cup and JD are the most collectible mowers. With snapper right behind them.

I used snapper for years their push mowers was the best. Now they are no better then a Kmart brand.

Old cub cadet garden tractors is the most popular mower ever made. In 20 years I don't think we can say that.

JD just has never made a real good riding mower. They do have some nice zero turns. But way over priced like xmark.
They do have a nice 4 wheel steer but still lacks power to the deck.

Look at Sears/ craftsmen was the king for years. Now they are just mutts.

Heck I brag about my Toro's but will not be buying them this year. Was looking at bad boy but thinking bobcat now.

Thank you!


#9

M

mjb8fj

How much yard do you have to cut? It does not seem like much difference between 42 and 46in, but that adds up.....


#10

S

Scott S

Hi....

I am considering purchasing one of these two mowers for mowing just under an acre of mostly flat residential turf which contains sections of Bermuda and fescue grass. There are some groups of trees on the property, but they should be able to easily be navigated with a lawn tractor. I have decided against getting a ZTR for this particular property. I am about to take over caring for my lawn mainly because I'm tired of the expense of having somebody else do it and I also now have the time since I just recently retired.

I have narrowed it down to two choices which I think will be adequate for weekly mowing during the season which runs about 8 months here:

1. John Deere S240 ($2299)

2. Cub Cadet Enduro XT2 LX46 ($1999)

Until about three weeks ago, I was completely sold on the recently redesigned John Deere S240 and was totally unfamiliar with Cub Cadet. This will be my first riding mower and I've always been partial to JD mainly because I like the way they look and they just seem to be a part of Americana.

However, after doing a lot of research, I thought it would be worth my time to consider Cub Cadet. I went to the local Cub Cadet dealer and drove the XT2 and that same day went to the JD dealer and drove the S240. I might add that it is almost impossible for a "newbie" to find any mower that doesn't have an equal number of positive and negative reviews. Regardless of the make or model, some swear by it and some swear at it.

So, that being said, I thought I would post similar messages on both the Cub Cadet and John Deere forums so I could get some additional information that will help me make a decision.

The Cub Cadet has a 46" deck with twin blades and anti-scalp wheels, is beefier and seems a bit more solid than the JD. I like where the fuel filler is located as the JD fuel filler is under the seat which makes it tough to fill if a bagger is attached and it is certainly a bit easier to remove the oil filter as the JD has a piece of plastic which gets in the way of getting a good grip on the filter. The CC also has a 3 year unlimited warranty vs. the JD which has a 3 year/200 hour warranty. However, in my situation, it is really a 3 year warranty as well because I won't exceed 200 hours in 3 years. I am aware that the S240 is based on a D series chassis.

The JD has a Kawasaki FS600V 18.5 hp engine which many people say is a superior engine (dependability, smoothness and quietness) as compared to the CC's 24 HP Kohler 7000 Series OHV engine with Smart-Choke. Some say it also helps the resale value as, for whatever reason, Kawasaki seems to have a better reputation with the general public. I'm not sure if that's true, but I've heard that from two different brand dealers who each sell tractors that come with Kohler, Kawasaki and Briggs and Stratton motors. In fairness, I also had one dealer tell me that all engine manufacturers go through periods where their products have both excellent and terrible years with the general public. Apparently, Kawasaki is enjoying a good period at this time. For a newbie like myself, it seems as if we're trying to find out which ice cream is better: vanilla or chocolate? There are millions of arguments for and against each one.

Both tractors have the Tuff Torq K-46 hydrostatic transmission.

The JD has a 42" deck with twin blades and anti-scalp wheels. The CC has armrests whereas the JD does not. Both have a great steering radius and turn easily although I might give the CC the edge in this area. The JD has a 2.4 gallon fuel tank vs. the CC having a 3 gallon tank. The JD has the floater type gauge on the frame whereas the CC doesn't have one at all but you can easily see the tank level through a slit.

I do not like the RIO switch on the JD. I think the CC is superior in both this area and the choke area.

The closest CC dealer is 23 miles away and I do not have access to a truck or trailer which means I'd have to pay the dealer to pickup and deliver the tractor for any maintenance issues. He will charge me $50 delivery and any future pickup/delivery will be $100 round trip. The JD dealer is 7 miles away and he will deliver it free and future pickup/delivery round trip costs will be $50.

So, reliability is even more important in my situation because not only will I have the hassle of not having the mower for up to 4 weeks at a time should it be in the shop during mowing season, but I'll also have the additional transportation expenses.

I have also read several posts where CC customer service is poor regarding warranty issues as everything seems to be ruled out due either normal wear and tear or user abuse e.g. hitting a tree root or using the mower for unintended purposes such as too large a property or rough terrain.

Between these two machines, I want the mower that will be the most reliable and will give the best cut. The JD is usually $2499, but there is a special offer of $200 off at this time. I also don't understand why there is a $500 premium with the CC to get the Kawasaki engine. If the dealer has a unit in stock with the Kawasaki, the price is $2499. The surcharge alone seems to indicate that the Kawasaki is a better engine, but then again this dealer said his mechanics have seen more issues with the Kawasaki engines vs. the Kohler. It should be noted that I spoke directly with the CC dealership owner for nearly 90 mins. regarding the CC.

I'm aware that this is being posted on the JD forum, but I would appreciate any impartial advice from your experience.

Thank you.

Scott

View attachment 29661View attachment 29662


Just under an acre.


#11

javjacob

javjacob

Between the 2 models listed you could just flip a coin on which one to get. You aren't getting a real John Deere until you get into the X series. Of the 2 models listed I wouldn't worry about the motor as either one will outlast the K46 transmission. John Deere tends to have better resale value if you ever decide to sell.


#12

S

Scott S

Between the 2 models listed you could just flip a coin on which one to get. You aren't getting a real John Deere until you get into the X series. Of the 2 models listed I wouldn't worry about the motor as either one will outlast the K46 transmission. John Deere tends to have better resale value if you ever decide to sell.

Thank you for the information.


#13

M

mjb8fj

Just under an acre.
just under an acre, not much of a difference with 42 and 46". I don't know much about cub cadet parts, deere well you can go in and say I need this or that and you can find it. Might cost some, as they are proud of that green colored part


#14

M

mjb8fj

Ok so first off I don't like the newer Deere stuff at all. They have cheapened most of the equipment they sell and still charge a premium for it.
Cub Cadet was purchased by MTD some years ago and left them alone to build their mowers and such. Now MTD is in direct control of Cub Cudet and is doing the same thing as John Deere. Now you know where I stand on each brand.

With that said it is now a difference of price and features. I like Kohler better than Kawasaki any day of the week. I like bigger stronger engines is why. HP to HP Kohler wins.
Bigger deck.
Nicer color.
Cub Cadet wins.

By the way your dealer is really who decides if something is covered under warranty unless CC gets involved. They don't get involved much.
So Get a good dealer.

I was going to argue with you here, but I don't have an argument. you got good points there. The Kohler vs Kawaski- well I have my pick of them, but that's the same argument of ford vs Chevy vs Dodge. All have there points here and there, and its what you prefer. I totally agree with you that all have cheapened the equipment nowadays!


#15

S

Scott S

just under an acre, not much of a difference with 42 and 46". I don't know much about cub cadet parts, deere well you can go in and say I need this or that and you can find it. Might cost some, as they are proud of that green colored part

Thank you.


#16

H

HawkFanatic74

Between the 2 models listed you could just flip a coin on which one to get. You aren't getting a real John Deere until you get into the X series. Of the 2 models listed I wouldn't worry about the motor as either one will outlast the K46 transmission. John Deere tends to have better resale value if you ever decide to sell.

These comments make me cringe. A John Deere is a John Deere. I currently have a LA125 for the farm acreage, a E130 for the house in Minnesota and another X729 is available as well for larger swaths of land. They're all John Deere equipment, made by John Deere, the same goes for our farm tractors and my 20+ year old JD Snow Blower. They all work well and are heavy duty and durable, even the LA125 and D130.


Top