Commercial can mean a lot of things to a lot of folks. If you use it for making money its commercial, literally. Doesn't mean it will hold up. Key words - hold up- They should actually use different terms altogether. Like industrial use or heavy use. Or light industrial use and medium industrial use.
I'd say its a light industrial use machine.
Pro Turn 100xdz is light/medium industrial. I also think light residential use , medium residential use, and heavy residential use would apply to some models. Confused yet.
comキmerキcial
[kuh-mur-shuhl] Show IPA
adjective
1.
of, pertaining to, or characteristic of commerce.
2.
engaged in commerce.
3.
prepared, done, or acting with sole or chief emphasis on salability, profit, or success: a commercial product; His attitude toward the theater is very commercial.
4.
able to yield or make a profit: We decided that the small oil well was not commercial.
5.
suitable or fit for a wide, popular market: Communications satellites are gradually finding a commercial use.
Tom59,
Thanks for your perspective on this, which really got me to thinking!!! I agree that maybe the 3 categories of (1)Residential/Homeowner, (2)Heavy Duty and (3)Industrial grade are much more appropriate in describing today's ZTR's. If maybe a Poll where all of the Moderators would be "tasked with" gleaning out the "components/features" of a ZTR that put's the ZTR, based upon containing a certain "percentage" of those that are deemed "Commercial Grade", into one of those three categories we could come up with some type of "Forum Recommended" rating system. Then we could encourage new users to try to view/rate ZTR's they are looking at into those definitions for manufacturer-to-manufactuer comparisons(to get an apples-to-apples level playing field). I, for one, would suggest that "at least" the components/features below be condidered in that voting/ratings determination:
1)Transmission series/type-Defining single units like the HydroGear as (1)EZT; (2)ZT-2800, ZT3100; (3)ZT-3400, ZT-5400 and of course the separate pumps/motors as (1).
2)Engine Make/Series-Defining which series in the leading makes such as Kawasaki, Kohler an Briggs & Stratton identifies them as (1), (2) or (3) as in the Kawasaki FR, FS & FX.
3)Deck Gauge-Defining whether 5, 7, 10, 13, etc. identifies them as (1), (2) or (3).
4)Deck Design-Most mfg's have "good", "better" & "best" decks(i.e. in Gravely line they have the (1)XLerator, (2)High Flow Tunnel and (3)X-Factor).
5)Weight-Would not a 700lbs, 900lbs & 1100lbs weight for a ZTR with the same deck cutting size machine indicate (1), (2) or (3) grade?
6)ROPS-In most cases I would consider (1)no ROPS, (2)Solid ROPS or (3)Foldable ROPS.
7)Anti-scalp Wheels-Existence of, number of and bracket strength/design.
8)Blade Tip Speed-This one is a very difficult one to determine as there is no "industry rating system" that I am aware of and no one on these forums will "go there".
9)And, finally.....Warranties-If a ZTR has a "Commercial Warranty" of at least 1 Year I guess you would have to give it a (1) in that "component/feature category", then (2) & (3) would be based upon the basic "Years/Hours" Warranty.
There are possibly many more areas that could be considered i.e. deck hanging system(chain hung, etc.) and maybe some other users can dissect my recommendations and/or suggest others. I fully understand that, just like agreeing on a minimum "professional cut blade tip speed", coming up with a "Forums Recommended" ZTR rating system may be something that is improbable at best. Or.......we can just continue to agree to disagree on what is/is not a "Commercial ZTR":0)