1) IF there is no Ω range in the repair specifications then the coil is not checkable with an Ω meter, simple as that.
and this is the case for the bulk of the coils supplied now days
2) yes you can check the secondary but as there is usually no repairs possible other than replacing the cap
Now I have only been in the repair business for 12 years and in that time would be lucky to do more than 30 or so had held tools a year so I do not have vast experience , however I am reasonably good with circuits so realise without any data on the exact type of Hall trigger fitted know that trying to measure primary resistance is a total waste of time unless one is specified
Even if the primary is within spec, that still does not mean that the Hall effect trigger is in fact working or if it is working that it is opening & closing the primary windings at the right time
And this is excluding other complications like rev limiters
Now I am 72 so when at school got taught to use log tables & slide rules
SO to my generation understanding the theory & principles was considered to be more important than the correct numerical value down to the 10th decimal point .
I went through university without the aid of a calculator for the first 2 years and bought my first one in my 3rd year of a 4 year degree after learing how a computer works but again for the purpose of exams it was slide rules & log tables
The co-hort that were 10 years behind me ( around 60 now ) are the first group where calculators were the norm & things like log tables & slide rules were not taught and they were the start of the innumerate graduates because they no longer understood numbers or their significance
Go back another 10 years ( around 50 now ) and you have the generation with no understanding of fundamental principles of anything all they know is how to get the "right " numbers down the the 10th decimal place
Thus they will post here that the coil has a resistance of 22.35 Ω because their meter is set to 2 decimal places and when I tell them to press the probes harder they can not understand why that gives a different set of numbers , or their battery is 12.71V
To this and subsequent generations the idea that there is not a "correct number " for everything is beyond their capacity for thinking .
To a big extent it is not their fault it is a total failure of the educational system
Now on some coils you can dig the potting mix out to find a screw that holds the HT lead in place but by the time I have done that plus repotted the joint I have spent $ 80+ worth of time fixing a $ 20 coil + $5 for the new wire & cap
Out of curosity I have actually cut open some coils to see what is in them , some have a PCB, some have the individual components to make the Hall effect trigger and one actually that 3 totally individual trigger circuits to compensate for the difference in spark timing needed between cranking speed of 200 rpm to running speed of 12,000 rpm and I think it was a Stihl one that had 2 individual primary windings to do the same job.
Now to electronically test a magneto coil you need a very high voltage output detector that discharges the induced voltage lest it find an easier way to ground and a means of generating a flux in the coil that varies in both magnitude and frequency .
For the mechanic these tools are way out of their price range .
Some ( like me ) do things like mount flywheels in lathes with the coil on a mount in the cross slide, an inductive tacho on the HT lead which then goes into a variable gap spark tool & finally to ground
However again just setting this up takes near an hour testing another 20 minutes plus another hour to run the same test with a known good magneto
And even with my special test pulleys on the lathe the best spindle speed I can get is 8720 rpm way too low to check the rev limiters
To me the very idea that a simple Ω reading can determine if a coil is functioning properly is quite laughable and I would suspect leads to a lot of good magnetos being consigned to the scrap bin .