I have been looking at the Toro Super Recycler 21382 with the Honda engine also but leaning towards the Honda HRX217 more so. Back story. I purchased a Toro Recycler with a B&S engine and it lasted about 7 years then I purchased another Toro Recycler which lasted 2 years until the Tecumseh engine gave out. In 2006 I purchased another Toro Recycler. In 2008 after Hurricane Gustav I cleaned up my yard and was left with clumps of leaves so I was going to use my mower to finish cleaning up the yard. Made it about 20 feet before the drive system locked up. It appeared the transmission was locked up. Tired after three days of cleaning up after the hurricane and still a large tree to remove, I went to the local HD to buy another Toro Recycler with the thought in mind my other one if not fixable without great expense would become a parts hound for the new one. At HD I told the worker the problems I was having with Toro mowers. He stopped and insisted I try the Honda HRR216 and offered $50 off. I struggled with the decision but ended up with the Honda. The Honda worked like a champ cleaning up my yard. A couple of weeks later I fixed the Toro which ended up the drive belt being off the pulley and jamming the drive system. The issue was hidden under the belt guard and fixing it was a bit of an song and dance due to the way the mower was constructed. From that point on I have cut my yard for the last 12 years alternating between the Honda and the Toro cutting the grass about 40 times a year. When you live in the humid South near the coast your grass will usually get cut during the winter months. Over those 12 years my Toro Recycler has has the rear wheels($45) with the plastic gears replaced three times, pull cord replaced, pull spring replaced, engine stop cable replaced, replaced the bag, and drive belt replaced. For the last four years the Toro requires a routine to start it. You pull back on the engine stop level 40-60 times to wear off the corrosion on the contacts and bounce the front wheels once to unstick the governor. The engine stop contacts have been cleaned and greased which did not last long and you have to remove two engine covers to get to it. (11/06/20) I noticed the Toro has a rust hole in the deck. I will say it took two years longer for the Toro to have a hole in the deck. I live in a high humidity area with a good bit of rain. In the meantime the Honda HRR216 has worked without any repairs until this year. The deck on the Honda developed a couple of quarter inch holes about six inches in front of the engine. I buffed off the paint around the holes on both sides and used JB Weld to patch the deck. (12/26/20) I noticed my Honda HRR216 has 5 more small holes on either side of where I repaired the original holes with JB Weld. The deck is rusting thru in a semi circle on the front part of the deck where the last couple of inches of the blade rotates underneath the deck. I use my mowers at the lowest setting and the Honda has always pulled much better and suck up the grass way better than the Toro. Both the my Toro and Honda have had at times the wheels lock up when pulling the mower backwards. The Toro did it a little more and both now only do it occasionally.
My Opinion Only Honda HRX217VKA vs Honda HRN216VKA vs Toro Super Recycler 21382 (updated 12/26/20)
1. Engine - Honda stronger 200cc new design larger engine vs Honda 170cc 10% stronger new design engine vs Toro older Honda design 160cc engine - 1-HRX217, 2-HRN216, 3-Toro SR
2. Deck Material - Plastic$$ vs Steel$ vs Aluminum$$ - Aluminum will eventually corrode, the plastic will stain from gas spillage, not sure which is stronger or better, steel rusts - 1-2-Tied-HRX217 & Toro SR, 3-HRN216
3. Double blade vs single blade vs single blade - Honda chops better, Toro blades from experience require more sharpening - Tied-HRX217 & HRN216, 3 -Toro SR
4. Select Drive vs Smart Drive vs Personal Pace - Set/adjustable Select Drive, adjustable Smart Drive, Personal Pace, the harder you push the faster it goes - 1-HRN216, 2&3-tied-HRX217 & Toro SR
5. Drive train system reliability personal experience - had better luck with Honda since the belt has jumped off the rear pully twice on the Toro - 1&2-tied-HRX217 & HRN216, 3-Toro SR
6. Bagging - Honda handles wet grass better, sucks up the grass better, and holds more grass than Toro - 1&2-tied-HRX217 & HRN216, 3-Toro SR
7. Wheels - Independent wheel adjustment vs two wheels at a time - Do not feel the two system will be as level - 1&2-tied-HRX217 & Toro SR, 3-HRN216
8. Wheel size - 9" vs 8" vs 8" - prefer 9" -1-HRX217, 1&3-tied Toro SR &HRN216
9. Wheel bearings - All wheels vs back-bearing & front sleeve vs sleeve only - 1-HRX217, 2-HRN216, 3-Toro SR
10. Axle - Sleeve with dust shield vs sleeve with dust shield vs bearings with grease nipples - 1-Toro SR, 2&3-tied-HRX217 & Hrn216
11. Warranty - 5 year vs 3 year vs 5 years - 1&2-tied-HRX217 & Toro SR, 3-HRN216
12. Discharge - Rear vs Rear vs Side - 1&2-tied-HRX217 & HRN216, 3-Toro SR
13. Price - $620 vs $410 vs $600 - Difference mostly about deck material for me - 1-HRN216, 2-Toro SR, 3-HRX217 - $200 less for HRN216 goes a long ways paying for maintenance & repairs
14. Cut closeness to front and sides - HRX217 front wheels out further and sides a tad wider - 1&2-tied-HRN216 & Toro SR, 3-HRX217
15. Bag installation - Honda bag ears face inward and mower slots clog with grass, Toro bag ears face outward with no clogging of slots but in the way for dumping into garbage bags - 1-Toro SR, 2&3-tied-HRX217 & HRN216
16. Bag endurance - Longer life vs longer life still fine vs shorter life 9 years - 1&2-tied-HRX217&HRN216, 3-Toro
17. Mulching - lever variable mulch/bag vs lever mulch/bag vs plug(side wing for side discharge) - 1-Toro SR, 2-HRX217, 3-HRN216 (Ranking is based upon several video reviews between Honda and Super Recycler)
18. Weight - 89 vs 79 vs 85 pounds - All within 10 pounds, not a big consideration since I will not be transporting the mower - 1-HRN216, 2-Toro SR, 3-HRX217
19. Adding Fuel - Wide opening vs wide opening vs smaller opening and vent tube slowing down fueling - 1&2-tied-HRX217 & HRN216, 3-Toro
20. Repair Record - Personal experience of 12 year comparing Honda HRR216 to Toro Personal Pace - 1-Honda, 2-Toro (Toro had numerous repairs whereas Honda only one)
I have relied heavily upon my personal side by side 12 year experience between a Honda HRR216 and a Toro Recycler, humid climate, 45-60 minute grass cutting, almost always bag, cut at the lowest setting, maintenance of fuel/oil/filter/parts only, and extensive search of internet information and reviews. Probably missing quite a few points and would welcome any comments good or bad to help me decide. Thanks to gotomow for helping me get my facts straight!
The Honda HRN216 information was provided as a reference only and the tally currently is:
Wins - Honda HRX217VKA 10 wins vs Toro Super Recycler 21382 6 wins
Ties 4 - HondaHRX217vsToro 21382