I am looking for opinions on what Honda mower I should be considering. I am looking at the HRX217HYA (Home Depot $699) or the HRR216K9VKA (home depot $429) I guess also in consideration is the HRX217VKA ($599 home depot)
Obviously there is a difference in price, but that is not what is driving my consideration. My delima is based on the hydostatic transmission in the 217HYA. All the marketing suggests that this is a better more durable upgrade, to the transmission that comes in the comercial modles. Along with that, if you spend the coin, you get the blade stop system, over the 217VKA for "only 100 bucks more."
The thing is, to me it seems the "paddle" lever systems in the HRR and 217VKA seem really nice interms of slowing down and speeding up without "Hunting" the transmission lever, but seems like your thumbs could tire from depressing the paddles the entire time while mowing. Which brings me to the question of if I decide to not pony of the cash for the hydrostatic transmission, and the blade brake system is not important to me, why would I not just save all the money and by the HRR? I don't believe that the more powerful motor is necessary for me as the mower I currently have in it's somewhat broken form, (a $250 dollar sears model) has not bogged down durring mowing.
I don't know the sq footage of my yard but It takes a little over an hour to cut, and no significant hills, and much of it requries manuverability.
Also, I do like the additional 4 in 1 system, but I don't think I would spend the extra cash just for that either. It seems if i were to spend the $699 it would be solely to get the hydrostatic trans and all the other "stuff" would be extra and nice but not features I consider a "must have."
Would love to hear from any have any experience with any of the three, or experience with both drive systems. As well as how well the leaf shreeding option works, as compared to just bagging them in the HRR mower.
Obviously there is a difference in price, but that is not what is driving my consideration. My delima is based on the hydostatic transmission in the 217HYA. All the marketing suggests that this is a better more durable upgrade, to the transmission that comes in the comercial modles. Along with that, if you spend the coin, you get the blade stop system, over the 217VKA for "only 100 bucks more."
The thing is, to me it seems the "paddle" lever systems in the HRR and 217VKA seem really nice interms of slowing down and speeding up without "Hunting" the transmission lever, but seems like your thumbs could tire from depressing the paddles the entire time while mowing. Which brings me to the question of if I decide to not pony of the cash for the hydrostatic transmission, and the blade brake system is not important to me, why would I not just save all the money and by the HRR? I don't believe that the more powerful motor is necessary for me as the mower I currently have in it's somewhat broken form, (a $250 dollar sears model) has not bogged down durring mowing.
I don't know the sq footage of my yard but It takes a little over an hour to cut, and no significant hills, and much of it requries manuverability.
Also, I do like the additional 4 in 1 system, but I don't think I would spend the extra cash just for that either. It seems if i were to spend the $699 it would be solely to get the hydrostatic trans and all the other "stuff" would be extra and nice but not features I consider a "must have."
Would love to hear from any have any experience with any of the three, or experience with both drive systems. As well as how well the leaf shreeding option works, as compared to just bagging them in the HRR mower.