Export thread

From Kubota To Scag......First Impressions

#1

B

Boocoodinkydow

I’m a residential user racking up about 50 hours per year. We spend much of the summer at the vacation home and the Bama lawn is usually much overdue when it does get cut.

I bought a new 2011 Kubota ZG222. I couldn’t fault it from a reliability aspect. Outside of scheduled maintenance and blade replacements the only thing I ever did was replace the battery and deck belt once each. But it did have some nagging quirks that bothered me.

The parking brake switch was virtually inaccessible and despite keeping the area blown out it often jammed and took some coercion to crank.

Unless I used premium gas it would diesel at shut off. I sensed that the engine was probably running hotter than it should have and I feel an oil cooler would have been a good additive.

The hood never latched tightly and constantly rattled. Annoying despite using ear protection.

Way too many zirk fittings and many were challenging to get to.

My biggest complaint was the fact it just didn’t like our infamous Bahia grass. Most of my grass is centipede but inevitably Bahia has a tendency to be invasive and if it’s much over ankle high I have to make 2-3 passes before getting a clean cut.

Time for something new!

I narrowed my choices down to a new Kubota Z700 series or the Scag Tiger Cat 2. Earlier in the season when shopping the Kubata dealer, the salesman owned up to the fact that the ZG models had some issues with stemmed grass but tried to convince me that improvements had been made. The dealership changed hands about a month ago and when I revisited last week the new salesman averred he’d had no complaints. I’m gonna call BS on that one. Looking at the new models, I didn’t see any noticeable differences in the new mower deck and felt there was probably not much improvement on cut quality of stemmed grass. When the salesman tried to pass a demo model off as new, that sealed the deal for the competition.

On to the Scag dealership. I opted for the Tiger Cat 2 with the 61” deck and 26 hp Kawi with EFI.

While the suspension seat on the Scag is a vast improvement over my old Kubota, I’ll have to give the nod to the new Kubota Z700 series in the comfort category. Initially, the ergonomic relationship among the seat, armrests, steering controls and footrests seemed awkward on the Scag. Fiddling with seat position and time in the saddle took care of this and I quickly found my comfort zone.

Comparisons to my old Kubota as well as the new series left me with a feeling that the Kubotas are more “refined” than the Scag. Engineering on the Scag seems simplistic yet rugged. And I state this in a positive context rather than negative. I’m in hopes that the simplicity of construction translates to ease of maintenance. The Kubata could be challenging at times. Many of the moving parts on my new mower appear to be off the shelf items that could be more economically procured or easily fabricated.

Shortly after delivery, I got a fright. Having barely completed my first lap, the mower suddenly came to a stop and it appeared that the “check engine” light was on. In a panic I started looking for the cause. It seemed my dealer had put just enough gas in it to load and unload it from the trailer. The light was just the sun light shining through it. Note to dealer: “I just spent $9000 with you. Is it gonna break you to spring for a couple of gallons of gas?!?!”

The cut quality of the Scag in Bahia is impeccable at nearly any speed. I’m impressed! With the increased ground speed, wider cut swath and not having to make multiple passes on tough grass, my cut time is going to be reduced significantly. It appears gas consumption is also going to be cut almost in half.

Really liking my new mower but I have a couple of gripes. First, it’s impossible for me to operate the deck lift unless I move the right control arm to the neutral position. Legs just too long. I’ve gotten used to being able to lift the deck on the fly to jump a small stump occasionally. Gonna really miss this if I can’t rectify it. I think I can raise the steering control arm by fabricating new piece of longer square bar stock that connects the handle to the mechanism.

The other complaint is the fact that during slower maneuvering in sparsely grassed areas, dust and debris discharge from the front of the mower deck is insane! Disappointing!!

When the honeymoon period expires, I may query my decision to abandon the Kubata line but right now I’m ecstatic with the Scag in spite of the couple of shortcomings. Looking forward to a long and happy association.


#2

mcdonell

mcdonell

Welcome to the site and thanks for writing the excellent review.

I have a 2014 Scag Cheetah 61V with the Kawasaki motor. I am a homeowner and also only log about 50 hours per year. My neighbor has a Turf Tiger Diesel with 61V. We both have all kinds of grass on our acreage and we never have to go over the same area twice. I mow at 2 3/4 inches and he mows at 3 1/2.

I hope my mower is the last one I ever have to buy. I change the oil and air filters twice as often as Scag requires. I change the blades once a year. I buy all the blades and my neighbor changes both our mowers at the same time. I use Royal Purple 40 wt. oil and regular gas. Maintenance is so easy. My Kawasaki only holds about 2 quarts of oil so I keep a close eye on it. It never uses any oil though.

My son has a 2017 tiger cat 2 with a 54" and Kawasaki motor. It has served him well.

Good luck with yours. I bet you will be happy with it.


#3

M

Mad Mackie

Look in your owners manual under custom cut baffle. This baffle can be adjusted to the cut height range that you usually mow in. Adjusting this baffle to the appropriate cut height will minimize blow out. Bear in mind that the Scag Velocity cutter decks produce a tremendous amount of air flow and there will be blowout. You also may try adjusting the seat farther to the rear to allow better leg clearance to the deck lift pedal.


#4

cpurvis

cpurvis

I change the oil and air filters twice as often as Scag requires.

Strange as it may seem, you're not doing your engine any favors by doing this. The dirtiest air your engine will get is with a brand new filter and a brand new oil filter passes bigger particles than one that has already been in use. Both of these filters do their best filtering at the end of their life, not at the beginning.


#5

L

Luffydog

Maybe they but the particles breakdown and pass Thur the filters into carb valves and rings and Trouble starts. Better to keep it clean also fresh air keeps engine from burning fuel and get hot just Less wear and tear on the engine.


#6

B

Boocoodinkydow

Thanx for the pointers, everyone.

I remember perusing an online owners manual while awaiting delivery and stumbled across the adjustable discharge baffle. I’ll definitely revisit this and do a little experimentation. Thanx Mad Mackie.

Appreciate the welcome, McDonnell. Your experience is encouraging. I, too, hope for long life from my mower.

I am a firm believer that clean oil and filters are the life of any engine. I’ve made a habit of changing oil, filters and blades at the beginning of mowing season without regards to hours.

A couple of additional observations. This mower is significantly louder than my old mower; to the point my wife made note of it from inside the house. I sense this may be being generated as much from the mower deck as from the engine. Not a big deal. I always mow with earbuds with noise isolating tips. Still love the tunes from my youth!

In spite of the much heftier weight of the Scag, it appears it’s going to be kinder to my turf when making turns.

I find the steering controls offer a crisper response than my Kubota did. Something I’m sure that experience will cure but presently control is sometimes slightly erratic for me.

Thanx again all.


#7

JGGMC

JGGMC

be sure to use ear protection.


#8

jekjr

jekjr

I am a commercial operator. I had a ZG 222 and a ZD 326 in 2014. I needed a third mower and I was about to pull the trigger on another 326. I demonstrated a Scag and was literally shocked at the difference. If there is anything built that will out cut a Velocity Deck on Bahia grass I would love to see it. I cut both of my Kubota mowers loose and wound up with 4 Scags. I always have used Tiger Cats. Personally I could not see the need to spend the extra money to go to the Turf Tigers or Cheetas. I have the 2014 still running with 2000+ hours on it with probably 90%+ of that being in Bahia grass cut on 14 day intervals. It has been assaulted and that is honestly not a strong enough word for what it has been through. I have spent little on it in repairs other than maintenance and things destroyed through abuse. If I could find better mowers I would out cut them I would be running them. My saying is “ if you want prestige get a Kubota, if you want to cut grass get a Scag.”


#9

B

BTBO

Welcome to the site and thanks for writing the excellent review.

I have a 2014 Scag Cheetah 61V with the Kawasaki motor. I am a homeowner and also only log about 50 hours per year. My neighbor has a Turf Tiger Diesel with 61V. We both have all kinds of grass on our acreage and we never have to go over the same area twice. I mow at 2 3/4 inches and he mows at 3 1/2.

I hope my mower is the last one I ever have to buy. I change the oil and air filters twice as often as Scag requires. I change the blades once a year. I buy all the blades and my neighbor changes both our mowers at the same time. I use Royal Purple 40 wt. oil and regular gas. Maintenance is so easy. My Kawasaki only holds about 2 quarts of oil so I keep a close eye on it. It never uses any oil though.

My son has a 2017 tiger cat 2 with a 54" and Kawasaki motor. It has served him well.

Good luck with yours. I bet you will be happy with it.

I too am a firm believer in changing the engine oil and filter more often than Scag recommends. I bought a Liberty Z 48" w/Kawasaki FR651V 21 HP. The Kawa manual only says to change the oil every 100 hrs--nothing about a break in period. I contacted Kawasaki Engines and was told due to advancements in engineering and manufacturing, that a break in is not necessary. So with less than 7 hrs on it, I drained and filled with Mobil 1 20W50 along with using the Mobil 1 102A filter. The filter is compatible to the stock Kawa filter with a slightly larger capacity, as confirmed by the tech dept at Mobil 1. It has a 99.2% single pass efficiency. Even better is the Bosch Distance Plus D3330 filter with a single pass efficiency of 99.9%.


#10

M

Mad Mackie

Scag operators manual for Liberty Z, engine oil/filter change intervals;
8 hours, change engine oil and filter.
Change engine oil after 50 hours or annually.
Change engine oil and filter after 100 hours.
Kawasaki FR651V, FR691V, FR730V Owners Manual/General-purpose Engine Owner's Manual:
The important words are 'General-purpose'!! This refers the operator to the specific machine operators/owners manual recommendations.
No break-in info.
100 hour engine oil change interval.
200 hour engine oil filter change interval.
Kawasaki sells engines, Scag sells some of the best Zero Turn Mowers available, think about this!
Take it from an old mech, you can change engine oil too often and you can change air filters too often! Air filters are a condition change item with the owners manual recommending the maximum time before change.
New engines are delivered to equipment manufacturers dry with no oil. Who knows what they put in the engines, just a hint, some mowers use 20W50 dino oil in the hydraulic systems so this oil is very available on the assembly lines, just a hint!!!


#11

L

Lawnman48

You can or you can't change oil and air filters to early?


#12

cpurvis

cpurvis

Pleated paper filters get progressively better as they get dirty. The biggest particles not captured by the filter will be when it is brand new.


#13

B

BTBO

Scag operators manual for Liberty Z, engine oil/filter change intervals;
8 hours, change engine oil and filter.
Change engine oil after 50 hours or annually.
Change engine oil and filter after 100 hours.
Kawasaki FR651V, FR691V, FR730V Owners Manual/General-purpose Engine Owner's Manual:
The important words are 'General-purpose'!! This refers the operator to the specific machine operators/owners manual recommendations.
No break-in info.
100 hour engine oil change interval.
200 hour engine oil filter change interval.
Kawasaki sells engines, Scag sells some of the best Zero Turn Mowers available, think about this!
Take it from an old mech, you can change engine oil too often and you can change air filters too often! Air filters are a condition change item with the owners manual recommending the maximum time before change.
New engines are delivered to equipment manufacturers dry with no oil. Who knows what they put in the engines, just a hint, some mowers use 20W50 dino oil in the hydraulic systems so this oil is very available on the assembly lines, just a hint!!!
Mad Mackie----Not to doubt your claim of it being possible to change engine oil too often------Would you please elaborate and explain why that is? Also, when time, I plan on draining the hydro oil at the specified time and filling with Amsoil synthetic 20W50. It claims to be specically formulated for hydrostatic systems on my Scag Liberty Z 48".


#14

M

Mad Mackie

I'm not a lube oil expert by any stretch of the imagination, but I do have many years of dealing with engines of many types.
Multi-viscosity engine oil has additives to make it multi-viscosity. Some of these additives have a very strong detergent ability to them. As engine run time increases, the detergent ability of the oil decreases as the oil breaks down. During this time, the oil filter collects the small particles that the oil has picked up and the cleaning quality of the oil "settles down" so to speak. This allows the oil to continue to lubricate but with less cleaning quality which is OK and when it is up to operating temperature, the moisture and unburned fuel that has collected in the engine and oil will vaporize.
When the engine oil is changed too often, the detergent cleaning quality of the oil is refreshed each time and the "settle down" time period of the oil isn't long enough. This prolongs the engine break in period and sometimes will not allow the engine to reach full break in. Piston rings and cylinder walls are the areas where break in is most affected.
Many small engines may take up to 50 hours of operation to settle in and reach a good break in condition. Some operators may only put 50 hours on a mower in half hour intervals in a year and some may put on many more hours in a year. Folks that run their machines for short times may not run long enough for the engine oil and drive systems oil to warm up and properly operate.
A few more thoughts:
Full synthetic engine oils have a stronger detergent quality to them than multi-viscosity fossil oils.
While any machine, engine or drive train is still under warranty from the manufacturer, it is highly recommended to use OEM filters and suggested lube oils and greases. I have seen where an engine failed while using OEM filters and the engine manufacturer replaced the engine even after the warranty had expired. I have seen the opposite where engine replacement on warranty was denied due to non OEM filters and non recommended oils having been used.
You decide!


#15

B

bertsmobile1

You have been watching too many Castrol TV adds.
Detergent oils clean nothing never have and never will
A detergent molecule will attach itself to anything other than oil, at one end only.
So what ends up happening is particales of crud in the oil end up with hundreds of detergent molecules totally engulfing them
When this big hairy blob gets to the filter, it gets stuck there, thus both the crud & the detergent molecules remain in the filter.
This can be as fine as a single pair of carbon atoms with 4 detergent molecules stuck like glue to them , or so they say ,
The bigger the detergent molecule the better the filter can remove them.

Your dishwashing detergent works the exact same way.
It has a pH raining salt ( same as cloths washing detergents ) that raise the pH which is what does the cleaning.
then the detergent molecules engulf the crud that has been dissolved off your dirty dinner plate so it stays in the dishwater and does not redeposit itself on your dishes.
There are some surficants in there as well which is why it bubbles & froths

Put a high detergent oil in a dirty engine and it will be every bit as dirty when you take it out.
Because we actually have an advertising standards department those type of stretching the truth to cover a lie adds don't run for long down here .

Monogrades that get used in older engines with DRY SUMPS do not have detergents because they rely on the little bits of crud bumping into each other and making big bits of crud so they will settle to the bottom of the oil tank and form a sludge.
during operation you get a fair amount of mixing between the circulating oil and the lighter portion of the sludge so it is recommended that OLD DRY SUMP engines have the oil tank removed & cleaned prior to using a detergent oil as the detergent will grab the big bits of loose crud and make them really big bits of crud.
The detergent molecules are lighter than the oil molecules so the big bits of crud which would usually sit below the outlet of the oil tank end up having an overall lower density caused by all of the detergent molecules wrapped around them.
Thus they end up floating high enough to be sucked back into the engine where in the case of BSA motorcycles they get pulled out by the full flow centrifugal oil filter inside the crankshaft , generally called a sludge trap.
When you run a very high detergent oil the floated off crud very quickly can fill up the sludge trap & block off the oil flow through the crank.
I think HD's have a similar trap in their cranks.
A detergent is basically a dispersant which is why you spray them on oil slicks to break them up but in that case the dispersant molecule is the same density as sea water so it breaks up the oil slick while preventing all of it dropping directly to the bottom of the watercoarse and forming a blanket on the bottom thus killing off everything there.


#16

M

Mad Mackie

How did I know that bertsmobile1 would post a scientific response!
Back in the 60s Exon came out with Uniflo 10W30 detergent engine oil. According to Exon, this was the final answer to the best engine oil ever. A lot of automobile service businesses started using this oil in customers cars. Back then not many engines had full flow engine oil filters as most had the 10% filters. Many engines of that vintage had hydraulic valve lifters and the first indication of the use of Uniflo 10W30 oil was clacking valve lifters. As time went on and some mechs wanted to find out what was causing the lifters to collapse, they found that crud that had been loosened up by the detergent engine oil had plugged the small holes in the lifters where oil under pressure supplied the lifters to keep them pumped up.
Castrol multi-viscosity engine oil was another source of this problem. Having been a member of the Service Managers Association in the 70s and 80s, we would get together and swap stories. There were folks from power equipment, marine and automotive businesses attending these meetings.
I have some knowledge of air cooled engines having been an aircraft mech for many years and dealt with small opposed four cylinder 65 HP Continentals to 28 cylinder, four rows of 7 cylinders on Pratt & Whitney R4360 3,500 HP radial engines, both dry sump and wet sump and aerobatic sumps. I also dealt with turbine engines when the change over to synthetic engine oils was going on. Also hydraulic systems were changed over to fire retardant synthetic fluids. We had to deal with all of this as mechs and it wasn't pleasant.
I'm done, I gotta get to work on some power equipment and make some billable hours!!
I still love you my fellow wrench brother and always look forward to your posts!


#17

cpurvis

cpurvis

Long time ago, I worked for a guy who had air tankers. Got to work on Wright R3350's, and P&W R2000's and R2800's. Very minor stuff, though, like plug changes, prop changes. R2800's were the most common as he had a lot of Douglas A26's. If they were running right, you could read the engine data plates from the pilot's seat if the cowls were removed.

IIRC, they all ran straight 50W Ashless Dispersant oil which was always black as coal, even though the engines consumed a lot of it.


#18

B

bertsmobile1

How did I know that bertsmobile1 would post a scientific response!
Back in the 60s Exon came out with Uniflo 10W30 detergent engine oil. According to Exon, this was the final answer to the best engine oil ever. A lot of automobile service businesses started using this oil in customers cars. Back then not many engines had full flow engine oil filters as most had the 10% filters. Many engines of that vintage had hydraulic valve lifters and the first indication of the use of Uniflo 10W30 oil was clacking valve lifters. As time went on and some mechs wanted to find out what was causing the lifters to collapse, they found that crud that had been loosened up by the detergent engine oil had plugged the small holes in the lifters where oil under pressure supplied the lifters to keep them pumped up.
Castrol multi-viscosity engine oil was another source of this problem. Having been a member of the Service Managers Association in the 70s and 80s, we would get together and swap stories. There were folks from power equipment, marine and automotive businesses attending these meetings.
I have some knowledge of air cooled engines having been an aircraft mech for many years and dealt with small opposed four cylinder 65 HP Continentals to 28 cylinder, four rows of 7 cylinders on Pratt & Whitney R4360 3,500 HP radial engines, both dry sump and wet sump and aerobatic sumps. I also dealt with turbine engines when the change over to synthetic engine oils was going on. Also hydraulic systems were changed over to fire retardant synthetic fluids. We had to deal with all of this as mechs and it wasn't pleasant.
I'm done, I gotta get to work on some power equipment and make some billable hours!!
I still love you my fellow wrench brother and always look forward to your posts!

Yes it was a problem with engines that relied on debris settleing out and forming a sludge suddenly having all of the contiminants staying in suspension.
IT is staggering just how much of the solids just stick together & drop to the bottom of the oil tank or sump.
However the story is still the same the detergent is not cleaning the engine as the TV adds suggested, it is just stopping the crud falling out of the oil and sitting in the bottom of whatever was used to collect the crud.
Hydraulic lifters would be a horror story because the entry hole is tiny.
The set up is exactly the same with BSA engines because the internal crankshaft filter was supposed to be cleaned out every 30,000 miles with the sludging mono grade oils .
This final filter was only ever designed to catch the stuff that did not form a sludge in the bottom of the oil tank , probably 5% to 20% of the total particulate contamination.
Suddenly it trapped 100% of all of the particulates and would block solid in as little as 10,000 miles thus the left side big end got little to no oil and got really annoyed so jumped out of the engine.
I have pulled apart engines where the sludge is packed in so hard it had to be drilled out with a very sharp wood drill because standard metal drills went blunt in a few minutes.
The manual tells you to hook the end of the basket with some wire, pull it out and reverse flush it.

So the problem you had then was idiots running their cars & trucks on a type of oil it was not designed to run on.
Back before spin on oil filters we used to drop the sump every couple of oil changes and scrape the mud out of the bottom as the sumps were deeper and used as sludging tanks,
Same story for tappet adjustments, part & parcel of this was manually washing the accumulated sludge from the inside on the rocker covers.
These build ups of "mud" were intentional and part of the lubrication system.
Once detergent / dispersant oil came into popular useage, this crud was still made by the engine, the only difference was it was supposed to be caught by the oil filter as finner particals not big blobs of sludge.
Ashless oils do not form anywhere as much sludge because they do not "burn" ( oxadize ) to the same extent as regular oils and can take a lot higher temperatures.
Prior to synthetic oils becoming popular most of the "ashless" oils came from Australia as our crudes contain no sulphur , no phosphorus and have the lowest ash content of any crude on the planet.
Thus we would export crude to the USA for refining into lubricating oil while importing crude to be processed into petrol because our crude made very low energy petrol because it has fewer volatiles ( which is why it has such a low ash content ).

The widespread adoption of synthetic oil for lubrication is the driving force behind the closure of all but 2 of the Australian Oil refineries as what our oil was desperately needed for ( mostly avaition oils ) no longer existed so we could not get premium prices for it.

As an aside that is the same reason why we export so much coal as just like the oil our coal deposits have the lowest Sulphur content ( no acid rain from burning it ) low Phosphouous and very low ash while having the highest coke crush strength ( good in blast furnaces & cupolas ) .

However I have ranted on for way too long.
The only point I really wanted to make is it is not the detergency that was causing the problems with bed in and "DETERGENTS DO NOT CLEAN" they are nothing more than an aid in transporting muck away which of course can & will end up depositing in all sorts of places where you don't want it to if the engine was designed to run on a standard oil.
I am no oil expert but I had some riding companions who were, but part & parcel of one of my degree was a short course on oils explaining what they were, what they do & how they do it. What was added, why it was added & how it worked.
Unfortunately this is missing from most certificate & diploma automotive engineering courses which is jhow advertising agencies get away with twisting facts into lies and confusing the public at large.


#19

M

Mad Mackie

Long time ago, I worked for a guy who had air tankers. Got to work on Wright R3350's, and P&W R2000's and R2800's. Very minor stuff, though, like plug changes, prop changes. R2800's were the most common as he had a lot of Douglas A26's. If they were running right, you could read the engine data plates from the pilot's seat if the cowls were removed.

IIRC, they all ran straight 50W Ashless Dispersant oil which was always black as coal, even though the engines consumed a lot of it.

From 81-94 I was an active duty member of the CTARNG and was a part timer before 81. We had Caribou aircraft with twin P&W R2000 7M2 engines, C45s with P&W R985s, Beavers with P&W R985 and Otters with P&W P&W R1340. CH37 helicopters with P&W R2800s with no reduction gear as they drove the transmissions for the rotor system. These R2800s were mounted on their backs with the output shafts vertical. Over the years many ex Army aircraft came to us for maintenance and reissue to other units.
The Designated Maintenance Examiner that I dealt with lived nearby and he was a 727 and a C-97 flight engineer. The outfit that flew freight in C-97s would periodically come to Bradley International Airport (BDL) in Windsor Locks, CT and I was called out by him to help do urgent maintenance on the R4360s on the C-97s. Doing a cylinder or two changes on R4360s outdoors was challenging to say the least with a serious 28 stack exhaust system many parts of which had to be removed before a cylinder removal could happen, but not until the cowlings were removed from the engine.
We used nondispersant mineral oil in overhauled round engines for the first 50 or so hours and then switched to LAD ll or LAD lll, ashless dispersant depending on the ambient temps. LAD LL is 50 weight as you know and LAD lll is 60 weight. Using non-disp oil initially made a lot of difference in oil consumption as it allowed the engines to "coke up" and seat the piston rings before switching to ashless disp oil. Very few of our round engines actually made it to TBO which was 1,500 hours. Military round engine cylinders were all chromed in the bore.


#20

cpurvis

cpurvis

Here's a picture of the B-17G, tanker 102. I never worked on it; only saw it once before it was sold.

IIRC, the fleet was:
1-B17G, which is now in the Palm Springs museum (see link; tanker 102 N3509G, named Miss Angela) http://www.air-and-space.com/Boeing B-17 Tankers.htm
2-DC-7B, one of which crashed near Pecos, TX.
6-Navy "DC-4's" (R5-D's?) which came out of the boneyard in AZ. Helped put tanks on these.
5-Douglas A-26 (machine guns nose)
1-Douglas B-26 (bombardier nose)

Previously had a Consolidated Privateer which was lost in a fire at Wenachee, WA airport.

He also had some Lockheed P2V's (or was it PV-2), but these were sprayers. Had internal tanks and wing booms. Used for spraying Malathion on mosquitoes.

A friend of his found a stock military A-26 with bomb racks still installed in an auto salvage yard in Marion, KS. The neighbor and his hired hand borrowed two fresh R2800's, went through the plane over one winter, and Bill (the guy I worked for) flew it home.

That was one of the most interesting jobs I had.

Sorry for the thread drift.


#21

M

Mad Mackie

We have digressed a bit but this is life!
Very interesting aircraft experience. There is something about those old birds that that I miss. My old Caribou 149 is still flying with the cavflight.org. We used 115/145 AVGAS in all the piston AC and the engine oil was always nasty. When 100LL was forced on us the oil looked a little better. I don't miss having to pre heat the engines though!
Fill up the oil and check the gas was an old joke, but it happened more often than we realized!
I was looking for something in my garage a while back and found a pair of my old Nomex flight gloves that were stained purple from preflight checks draining the fuel strainers, 115/145 had purple color to it. :cool:


#22

cpurvis

cpurvis

Agreed. There really is something special about those old radial engine planes. Each one of those cylinder jugs is a masterpiece of engineering and manufacturing and each engine had 7, 9, 14, 18, or in your case, 28 of them! And thousands were built.

I've never seen one, but the Napier sleeve-valve engines sounded like they were even more complicated.


Top