Mackie, Thanks for the lead. I looked at the owners manual on the 750FX , and three things stood out to me. A good looking , large aircleaner. The "oversquare" pistons must be a spillover from Kaw's motocycle design (piston dia larger than stroke). A bit surprising when torque is the object. Last an OIL COOLER!. I could not see any fan so perhaps some blast is provided from the fan. If B&S would put on oil coolers I bet their field failures would drop 30%. Maybe they need the turnover, but bad PR. motoman
Thanks to each and everyone that's contributed to this thread.
Until recently, I didn't know there are so many different Kawasaki engine models powering ZT mowers on the market.
I naively thought that if a Kawasaki engine is powering your mower, hoo whee, you were good to go. Yeah buddy, First class engine all the way! Not realizing there are many different quality levels within Kawasaki engines.
Now I wonder if an FR is light years lower in quality than an FX and is maybe on par with a B&S Intex, but the Kawasaki name goes a long way in marketing to the public...?
Or, no, even an entry level/basic quality Kawasaki engine is still way higher in overall quality than say a B&S Intex (or equal)?
Nwatson99,
No, not yet.
Currently, I'm doing my "due diligence" before my next ZT mower purchase. (assuming I buy another as they all seem plagued with one kind of problem or another)
And thanks Motoman and Mad Mackie for your input.
It seems there's no one greatest ZT.
If you look at all the problems discussed on the various threads, it would appear they're all problematic in one area or another...
There are no "Rolls Royce's" that stand out as "THE" ZT to buy...or if there is, it's so outlandishly expensive as to be affordable by only the very wealthy and the very wealthy don't cut grass - they let someone else cut it.
The FR has cast iron cylinder liners, I think the differences are mostly external such as the air filter, carbs, starter...