Export thread

Cub Cadet XT2 / John Deere X350

#1

R

rlpickering13

I am narrowing my search down for my first riding mower. I believe I have narrowed it to the Cub Cadet XT2-LX42 / John Deere X350 42”. I visited a Cub Cadet dealer today and also a JD dealer. I feel like these mowers are very comparable. I like the price of the Cub Cadet, almost $1000 less. I also like the 4 anti-scalping wheels on the Cub Cadet deck. The JD X350 is also very nice, I have read a lot of good reviews on the Kawasaki Engine in the JD and I am not as familiar with the Kohler Engine in the Cub Cadet. Both mowers have the K46 transmission. Would love to here feedback from anyone! Would like to purchase within the next week or two.


#2

gotomow

gotomow

Have you looked at the JD S240?


#3

C

cruzenmike

The XT2 is a decent upgrade over the XT1 series but I wouldn't say it is better than the X350. The engine on the XT2 may be more HP but the Kawasaki in the X350 is going to be quieter, smoother and more fuel efficient. The deck on the X350 is going to perform better. I have owned an older cub cadet and a newer one and the most recent version of the signature series deck on the Cub Cadets is not that great. The AccelDeep deck is deep and has a smooth top with little to no obstructions for clippings before they come out. Also the X350 has a mulch on demand mode. The Cub Cadet does have better steering in my opinion (lighter). The John Deere also comes with a longer warranty when you are in the signature series (4yrs instead of 3). The lack of anti-scalp wheels on the back side of the Deere will only be an issue if you have an extremely un-level lawn or if you are cutting the grass low. The K46 transmissions in the two mowers are not necessary the same. Some versions of the K46 use steel-cut gears and are more robust; I believe the Deere to have a "better" version of the k46 than the Cub Cadet.

I am not at all a John Deere fan, and I have owned Cub Cadets that mowed beautifully and ones that have gave me nothing but problems (same mower actually), but at the end of the day, John Deere just makes a better machine when considering your two options. If you were shopping the Deere E series against the XT1 I would say Cub Cadet all the way. If you were shopping X300 series to XT3 series I would also vote for the Cub Cadet.


#4

R

rlpickering13

Thanks for a all the great info, I bought the John Deere X350 this afternoon. I am picking the mower up tomorrow afternoon as soon as I pick up my Son (10 years old) from school, I think he is more excited than I am. I got the mulch on demand kit installed. This mower is probably more than I will need but I feel like it will serve me well for years to come.


#5

gotomow

gotomow

Thanks for a all the great info, I bought the John Deere X350 this afternoon. I am picking the mower up tomorrow afternoon as soon as I pick up my Son (10 years old) from school, I think he is more excited than I am. I got the mulch on demand kit installed. This mower is probably more than I will need but I feel like it will serve me well for years to come.

Awesome choice, let us know how much you love it!


#6

D

dmenn

The K46 transmissions in the two mowers are not necessary the same. Some versions of the K46 use steel-cut gears and are more robust; I believe the Deere to have a "better" version of the k46 than the Cub Cadet.

I don't believe this is correct. There is only one K46. They don't make variants of it. The K46 in the Cub XT1/XT2 is the same as the K46 in the JD (S240/X350).. and the same as others offering it as well, like the Simplicity Regent.

Check it out: https://www.tufftorq.com/product/k46/


#7

C

cruzenmike

I don't believe this is correct. There is only one K46. They don't make variants of it. The K46 in the Cub XT1/XT2 is the same as the K46 in the JD (S240/X350).. and the same as others offering it as well, like the Simplicity Regent.

Check it out: https://www.tufftorq.com/product/k46/

Yes, the site you are linking to shows two different gear ratios, but the parts listing for the K46 show more than 50 different variants/models.

https://www.tufftorqservices.com/instance1/servlet/WebDispatcher?mode=comnet&nextMode=&nextURL=

Search the Catalog Shop from the link below and type in "k46" and see all of the different variants.

For example, the John Deere X350 uses a K46BR. The Cub Cadet XT-2 42" used a K46DM. A side-by-side comparison of the parts lists for just these two transmissions shows differences in the axle shafts, pump shafts, final pinon gear and some bolts. While these differences may be only to make the hydrostatic fit/work in the x350, they are still differences none-the-less. The transmission on the Cub Cadet may very well have the same "durability" as far as the internals, but the different gear ratios between them will equate to differences in torque. It is the ease of creating torque that will help one last longer than the other.


#8

R

rlpickering13

Used the X350 today to cut my yard and wow! The power and the feel of this mower is great. It is exactly what I wanted and I am very happy!


#9

C

cruzenmike

Used the X350 today to cut my yard and wow! The power and the feel of this mower is great. It is exactly what I wanted and I am very happy!

That is good to hear! I have said it many times before that I am not a Deere fan, mostly because I do think that they are overpriced and over-hyped but more and more I am starting to believe that they do make the best mowers in the premium class (x300/x500).

Maybe post some pictures of the cut?


#10

D

dmenn

Yes, the site you are linking to shows two different gear ratios, but the parts listing for the K46 show more than 50 different variants/models.

https://www.tufftorqservices.com/instance1/servlet/WebDispatcher?mode=comnet&nextMode=&nextURL=

Search the Catalog Shop from the link below and type in "k46" and see all of the different variants.

For example, the John Deere X350 uses a K46BR. The Cub Cadet XT-2 42" used a K46DM. A side-by-side comparison of the parts lists for just these two transmissions shows differences in the axle shafts, pump shafts, final pinon gear and some bolts. While these differences may be only to make the hydrostatic fit/work in the x350, they are still differences none-the-less. The transmission on the Cub Cadet may very well have the same "durability" as far as the internals, but the different gear ratios between them will equate to differences in torque. It is the ease of creating torque that will help one last longer than the other.

rlpickering13 - Sorry I hijacked your thread about K46 transmissions. When I was considering a lawn tractor, the X350 was at the top. Real nice machine!

Cruzenmike - Thanks for the clarification on the K46's. However, I don't understand why you would say the JD K46 is better than the CC K46. While they may have minor differences like you said, they all have the same gear internals. Per the web-site, the K46 transmission is "Heat-treated Powder Metal" for gears.


#11

C

cruzenmike

rlpickering13 - Sorry I hijacked your thread about K46 transmissions. When I was considering a lawn tractor, the X350 was at the top. Real nice machine!

Cruzenmike - Thanks for the clarification on the K46's. However, I don't understand why you would say the JD K46 is better than the CC K46. While they may have minor differences like you said, they all have the same gear internals. Per the web-site, the K46 transmission is "Heat-treated Powder Metal" for gears.

Because everything John Deere is better; duh!

Really I don't know. If it is in fact just the increased torque, then yes, it is better.


#12

Z

zadok

Sorry, as a "newbie" (was accused of that...) I think JD is a great choice. However... if I were to shop for something in that price range, I'd be asking questions like these:

- Who really makes the machine (aside from the logo decal on it)?
- Engine design: Does it have "good" bearings on the PTO side? I like to talk to mechs as well, like what do they think the MTBF is, have they had to adjust valve clearances, etc?
- Frame gauge? I'd also look at things like how the transaxle is attached to the frame.
- Deck guage?
- Grease fittings - how many and where?
- Steering gear... really, I would crawl under the machine, eyeball the build.
- Front wheel bearings / grease fittings?
- Of course the tranny brand / model
- Google reviews of the dealer.
- Test drive, looking for handling, ride quality, ergonomics, seat quality, and why are we buying a mower?? Cut quality.
- I'd be interested in center of gravity - but this is hard to spec out, but you can measure engine height on frame, track width of both axles.

And above and beyond, I like to rap with the dealer guy, like if he's been to the factory, seen production, knows where they source the steel, how many coats of paint, who's using these (customers with huge lawns), etc. If you buy from a servicing dealer, they typically are going to be concerned about YOU. Whereas if you buy from a big box store, you only have this forum from which to make your decision>

Again, just IMO -- remember, I'm a newbie here...


#13

B

bertsmobile1

From the top.
JD will be made by JD or by Honda. The Cub is made by Cub which is owned by MTD so it shares a lot of parts with other MTD's
Only Horizontal shaft engines have bearings which is one reason why they cost twice as much and last 10 times longer.
Frame gauge is generally in the spec sheets somewhere but thickness is only 1/4 of the story, there are a lot of grades of steel.
Same story for deck gauge
Grease fitting or the lack there of is subject to EPA regulations. No zerks on Californian mowers.
Do you have any idea about the engineering of steering gear, very few have but real adjustable tie rod ends are good to have.
Most use the same front wheels.
Trannies are made to the specs of the mower factory
Very few people will bother to write a good review and for a handfull of rupees I can get 500 glowing reviews using stolen ids. Bad reviews always have to be read carefully firstly for the same reason as good ones and secondly there are a lot of cheapskate morons out there
Test drives are good, but only if they can be done on your property.
COG is always a problem with mowers but not as important as wheel load.

The only honest opinion you will get comes from people like me who are independent repair technicians.
I get under a mower & look at the bearing surfaces. Are there bushes everywhere that a shaft passes through a plate.
I see a lot of mowers where the deck is on the ground at 1/2 full height after a few years requiring the replacement of the entire deck lift mechanism.
Does the deck have adjustments both sides & at the front.
Read the owners manual maintenance section and ask the parts department how much the actual service parts cost
Ask the service department about alternative blades, high lift & low lift.
look at the thickness of the blades thin narrow blades will need to be replaced every season


#14

Z

zadok

Cool, yeah got it! Correct on the techs... I have several friends who do small equip work for a living... But of course everybody has their opinion (and so do I!)

Dunno what's out there for vert shaft stuff. I did have a B&S Vanguard twin that, according to the manual, had roller bearings on the PTO end. Back in the day you would see sleeve bearings get out of round a little but as long as the oil seal remained intact, never worried too much about it, same with cf end-play. I mean these were engines that had hours on them so no worries...

I've always enjoyed this stuff.. I've been looking around a little and IMO it seems you've got to spend around $4k or so to get into something a little closer to "commerical grade," I mean with nice 10ga or better, or fabricated decks, etc. Dunno again about engines these days as B&S ditched their Vanguard series for who knows how long the current cast-sleeve ones will last. I've seen the Vanguards go thousands of hours, running full synth oil and "real" gas, if you know what I mean :)


#15

C

cruzenmike

Cool, yeah got it! Correct on the techs... I have several friends who do small equip work for a living... But of course everybody has their opinion (and so do I!)

Dunno what's out there for vert shaft stuff. I did have a B&S Vanguard twin that, according to the manual, had roller bearings on the PTO end. Back in the day you would see sleeve bearings get out of round a little but as long as the oil seal remained intact, never worried too much about it, same with cf end-play. I mean these were engines that had hours on them so no worries...

I've always enjoyed this stuff.. I've been looking around a little and IMO it seems you've got to spend around $4k or so to get into something a little closer to "commerical grade," I mean with nice 10ga or better, or fabricated decks, etc. Dunno again about engines these days as B&S ditched their Vanguard series for who knows how long the current cast-sleeve ones will last. I've seen the Vanguards go thousands of hours, running full synth oil and "real" gas, if you know what I mean :)

Briggs did not ditch the Vanguard engines. They are moving production from Japan to the United States this year. The Japanese made Vanguards I read were manufactured by Daihatsu which may be owned by Toyota. It would be no surprise as to why they may be so reliable. 12 years and 550 hours on mine and it is purring like a kitten!

The issue with these engines is that there simply isn't anyone testing each engine on a bench under the most rigorous of conditions and doing so without a bit of bias. if someone were to grab let's say a handful of each make of engine, Kawasaki Briggs Kohler and throw them onto a bench and then test each one for up to a thousand hours under full load and then letting the load go and then with or without oil changes being done and then getting them up to full temperature or sometimes low temperature/high temperature intermittently and then being able to see which one either has the most internal wear or which one fails first might give us some idea as to which of these engines is actually the most durable or most reliable. But at the end of the day all that we can go by is the experiences of those who share them and since each person uses and cares for their equipment in different ways not one person's experience is going to be the same as another. My Grandfather had three Toyota cars that all got over 240,000 miles without any type of major engine malfunctions. In fact he actually had one car, a 1984 Toyota Supra that had over 330,000 miles on it and all it ever need replacing was a water pump and the normal wearable items. So, was it Toyota that made good engines or was it my Grandfather that just took really good care of them?


#16

B

bertsmobile1

The problem is strait out greed.
Everything that i want has to get cheaper every year so I can afford it as well as the month long holiday in Florida and the 4 investment condos in New York.
So everything gets cheaper every year, in more ways than the price tag.
So bearings which have to be bought in so get paid for months before the mower is sold get abandoned in favour of casting the boss inside the engine 1/2" longer and the crank runs strait on the cases.

Right down to sealing the rocker covers with silastic which saves about 50¢ a mower but adds 1/2 hour to the service to clean all of it off.
The in warranty service fees have not gone up so dealers no longer check the valve lash


#17

Z

zadok

Briggs did not ditch the Vanguard engines. They are moving production from Japan to the United States this year. The Japanese made Vanguards I read were manufactured by Daihatsu which may be owned by Toyota. It would be no surprise as to why they may be so reliable. 12 years and 550 hours on mine and it is purring like a kitten!

The issue with these engines is that there simply isn't anyone testing each engine on a bench under the most rigorous of conditions and doing so without a bit of bias. if someone were to grab let's say a handful of each make of engine, Kawasaki Briggs Kohler and throw them onto a bench and then test each one for up to a thousand hours under full load and then letting the load go and then with or without oil changes being done and then getting them up to full temperature or sometimes low temperature/high temperature intermittently and then being able to see which one either has the most internal wear or which one fails first might give us some idea as to which of these engines is actually the most durable or most reliable. But at the end of the day all that we can go by is the experiences of those who share them and since each person uses and cares for their equipment in different ways not one person's experience is going to be the same as another. My Grandfather had three Toyota cars that all got over 240,000 miles without any type of major engine malfunctions. In fact he actually had one car, a 1984 Toyota Supra that had over 330,000 miles on it and all it ever need replacing was a water pump and the normal wearable items. So, was it Toyota that made good engines or was it my Grandfather that just took really good care of them?

Awesome! I'm glad someone actually said this. I did not know about the Japanese production.. Yes, with dyno testing, oil consumption, all of it... The thing is, and you know this, any of these guys are capable of making an engine that will go 2-4k hours. How long do these things go on commercial rigs, with good maintenance? Just curious; never asked any of the techs I know...


Top