The only advantage is lighter weight and a larger power to weight ratio on the 2 stroke Lawnboy. Of course, if it had been a dependable mower, I could boast about never having to change the oil in the 2 stroke Lawnboy, but alas, the Lawnboy has been a very high maintenance machine. Also, if I had very hilly property to mow, the Lawnboy would arguably be a better choice for mowing on steep grade mowing areas. But my lawn is basically flat,. so that's not an issue.
I bought that Snapper new in 1988 and it's still going strong. It weighs a LOT more than the Lawnboy, but it has variable speed rear wheel drive, so that's really not an issue. The Lawnboy has rear wheel drive too, but it's not needed. When I can keep the Lawnboy running, you could push it with two fingers unless you were mowing 9" grass.
I need to make a decision because I think that again, I'm in for a long diagnosis and service period with the Lawnboy. There is almost no compression, and it probably needs new piston rings, and perhaps more. It could also be the head gasket or a combination of things, including reed valves. Before I even get into it, I have to decide if it is worth it. I can't seem to get more than one season on the Lawnboy before another major service issue crops up. As opposed to the Snapper with a Wisconsin Robin 4 stroke engine that has been running without service issues (outside of regular maintenance) since 1988.