good for ME but its disturbing.
You find this disturbing because of your level of mechanical aptitude. You know enough about how a machine operates to determine how much of a waste neglect can be. You understand that the cost of maintenance is a small percentage of the cost of replacement.
You maintenance costs are low because of your mechanical aptitude. You perform this maintenance and repairs yourself, so the cost is negligible.
In contrast, the person who has no idea how to maintain equipment is left to pay someone else to perform the task. The cost of this type of maintenance makes the cost of replacement seem to make sense, especially if the owner does not have a way to get the mower to the shop. So the owner, with no knowledge or ability, tries to lower these operating casts by neglecting ( perhaps not intentionally) the machine and has resigned himself to the fact that the mowers last 2-4 years and then they should be replaced, amortizing this cost over the ownership period. He compares these costs to the cost of paying someone else to do the work and he sees it as "saving a bundle".
So, you see it's not really disturbing at all, everybody wins. :thumbsup:
The owner gets what he or she wants.....a new machine (and a new monthly payment). You get a used machine with a lot of hours left.
Jobs are created, the economy is boosted because he (Mr. Tyrone Neglectalot) bought a new mower, and you bought some parts, and life is good.
So
thank you for helping out in these poor economic times :smile: