But keep in mind that the maximum recommended rpm is going to be based on blade length. the longer the cutting blade the slower the engine needs to run.The condition of the blade and the RPM of the blade probably make the most difference in cut quality, as long as you are comparing equal setups between the 2 mowers. By that I mean, you weren't running the Honda in "mulch mode" while the Yard Machine was running "side chute" mode, where you ??
The RPM is set by the governor, which IS adjustable. The catch is Home Depot isn't going to have anyone that is qualified or has the equipment to make that adjustment. The best you can do at HD is go back and listen to 4 identical units. Taking it to a pro shop that doesn't know you at this time of year is going to be 8 weeks and $100.
I don't see a really good option here, except to return it and buy a mower from a pro shop. There are numerous brands with Honda engines.
Honda’s are great machines, but you don’t purchase one if you want to side discharge. They are highly regarded for their mulching & bagging capabilities in the same manner Toro Recyclers are regarded as the best for mulching. Messing with the governor will void your warranty. If you‘re disappointed with its performance, return it and purchased a self propelled Troy-Bilt.Not sure about the blade, but the mower is not a side-discharge mower. It's a back bag mower...
It just sucks that I am as underwhelmed by this mower as I am. I was expecting more (to be honest) from Honda.
How did you form that opinion?But keep in mind that the maximum recommended rpm is going to be based on blade length. the longer the cutting blade the slower the engine needs to run.
I suspect that part of the issue is due to a different style blade. the old mower most likely is a side discharge blade and the new Honda is a hybrid side discharge, bagging, mulching blade which doesn't really do any of the three very well.
Poor cut? What brands are better than Honda?Every Honda mower I've used from the low end to commercial jobs all run at low revs like 2600-2800rpm. This is how they make them quieter. Crank the revs up to 3600 and they will sing as loud as the rest of them. Also lower revs means less engine wear and fuel consumption. The deck design and blade equates to cutting quality. Summation from all my Honda experience is they are "good" mowers. Notice the word "good". They will last a good bit and most people don't recognize a poor cut. Are there better mowers out there than Honda, sure are. Two brands come to mind.
P.S.
Lastly, my main issue with Hondas is the lack of engine torque. If you have dense grass like my Zenith Zoysia or Tifway Bermuda, look elsewhere. You need a big Briggs 190cc at minimum on these grasses.
Which opinion are you talking about. That engine rpm is based on a maximum safe blade tip speed of 19,000 fpm or that a blade used for multiple applications doesn't really do any of those applications to the best of their ability.How did you form that opinion?
OP said his 15 year old Yard Machine for one.Poor cut? What brands are better than Honda?
1) That Honda’s are only “good” mowers, & 2) that they only operate @ 2800 rpm.Which opinion are you talking about. That engine rpm is based on a maximum safe blade tip speed of 17,000 fpm or that a blade used for multiple applications doesn't really do any of those applications to the best of their ability.
It sounds like you have not as well. The 200cc on a HRX does quite well, as does the 163cc on a Toro. Blade sharpness enhances any mowers cutting ability. Which makes me wonder, how low are you trying to cut? And from what length?OP said his 15 year old Yard Machine for one.
My 40+ year opinion of using and working on most everything, not everything like some of the guys on here, I still haven't found better pusher than Snapper HI-Vacs. No other mower even comes close,,,,, in bagging, to a Snapper. And that bagging specific deck still mulches as good as any other out there if not better. I haven't used their Ninja recycling deck yet, looking for one.
Toro's Super Recyclers are another mower that MULCH at the top of the list too. I don't know about the new black models. The older red aluminum decks are great mulchers. Bagging performance is rather lacking just like Honda.
Shoot, I've even had several Craftsman mowers that were pretty salty.
On your "4.4hp @ 3600 rpm & 6.9 lb-ft @ 2500 rpm to mow grass" comment, sounds like you've never cut Zoysia or Tifway Bermuda. If you lower the cut one mower notch, you can and will stall the engine. You have to sloooowly push the mower while doing this. Can't use normal self propel either. Even my Snapper 33" RER with a 14.5hp engine gets a tough workout on my grass. Got to keep a sharp blade.
slomo
And neither one of those was my opinion. I never said anything about Honda being the only good mower or mowers operate at 2800 rpm. I said rpm is based on blade length.1) That Honda’s are only “good” mowers, & 2) that they only operate @ 2800 rpm.
With my money, I will never buy a Honda. Too many levers on the bar to hold down and twist. Entire mower won't back up (huge post on here about this). Engines are down on torque compared to the competition (do your own research). Poor bagging performance (won't even pick up maple tree helicopter seeds). Initial cost of the machine is quite high especially compared to a Yard Machine or Craftsman LOL.1) That Honda’s are only “good” mowers, & 2) that they only operate @ 2800 rpm.